Let GPT be a Math Tutor: Teaching Math Word Problem Solvers with Customized Exercise Generation
Zhenwen Liang, Wenhao Yu, Tanmay Rajpurohit, Peter Clark, Xiangliang Zhang, Ashwin Kalyan
Abstract
In this paper, we present a novel approach for distilling math word problem solving capabilities from large language models (LLMs) into smaller, more efficient student models. Our approach is designed to consider the student model's weaknesses and foster a tailored learning experience by generating targeted exercises aligned with educational science principles, such as knowledge tracing and personalized learning. Concretely, we let GPT-3 be a math tutor and run two steps iteratively: 1) assessing the student model's current learning status on a GPT-generated exercise book, and 2) improving the student model by training it with tailored exercise samples generated by GPT-3. Experimental results reveal that our approach outperforms LLMs (e.g., GPT-3 and PaLM) in accuracy across three distinct benchmarks while employing significantly fewer parameters. Furthermore, we provide a comprehensive analysis of the various components within our methodology to substantiate their efficacy.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 24628ddb-8256-45d7-8398-14b60307c8eaCited by top-tier papers4
- A Cooperative Multi-Agent Framework for Zero-Shot Named Entity RecognitionZihan Wang, Ziqi Zhao, Yougang Lyu, Zhumin Chen et al.WWW 2025 · 16 citations
- Classroom Simulacra: Building Contextual Student Generative Agents in Online Education for Learning Behavioral SimulationSonglin Xu, Hao-Ning Wen, Hongyi Pan, Dallas Dominguez et al.CHI 2025 · 13 citations
- Error-driven Data-efficient Large Multimodal Model TuningBarry Menglong Yao, Qifan Wang, Lifu HuangACL 2025 · 1 citation
- SCRIBE: Structured Chain Reasoning for Interactive Behaviour Explanations using Tool CallingFares Fawzi, Vinitra Swamy, Dominik Glandorf, Tanya Nazaretsky et al.EMNLP 2025
Builds on12
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Large Language Models are Zero-Shot ReasonersTakeshi Kojima, Shixiang Shane Gu, Machel Reid, Yutaka Matsuo et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 8,168 citations
- Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language ModelsXuezhi Wang, Jason Wei, Dale Schuurmans, Quoc V. Le et al.ICLR 2023 · 681 citations
- Least-to-Most Prompting Enables Complex Reasoning in Large Language ModelsDenny Zhou, Nathanael Schärli, Le Hou, Jason Wei et al.ICLR 2023 · 318 citations
Related papers
- MathScale: Scaling Instruction Tuning for Mathematical ReasoningZhengyang Tang, Xingxing Zhang, Benyou Wang, Furu WeiICML 2024 · 163 citations
- Exposing the Achilles' Heel: Evaluating LLMs Ability to Handle Mistakes in Mathematical ReasoningJoykirat Singh, Akshay Uttama Nambi, Vibhav VineetACL 2025 · 10 citations
- Stepwise Verification and Remediation of Student Reasoning Errors with Large Language Model TutorsNico Daheim, Jakub Macina, Manu Kapur, Iryna Gurevych et al.EMNLP 2024 · 1 citation
- Template-Theorems Graph Construction to Enhance Mathematical Reasoning Capabilities of LLMYarong Lan, Yajing Xu, Huajun ChenAAAI 2026
- MMTutorBench: The First Multimodal Benchmark for AI Math TutoringTengchao Yang, Sichen Guo, Mengzhao Jia, Jiaming Su et al.ACL 2026 · 2 citations
