PlatoLM: Teaching LLMs in Multi-Round Dialogue via a User Simulator
Chuyi Kong, Yaxin Fan, Xiang Wan, Feng Jiang, Benyou Wang
Abstract
The unparalleled performance of closedsourced ChatGPT has sparked efforts towards its democratization, with notable strides made by leveraging real user and ChatGPT dialogues, as evidenced by Vicuna. However, due to challenges in gathering dialogues involving human participation, current endeavors like Baize and UltraChat rely on ChatGPT conducting roleplay to simulate humans based on instructions, resulting in overdependence on seeds, diminished human-likeness, limited topic diversity, and an absence of genuine multi-round conversational dynamics. To address the above issues, we propose a paradigm to simulate human behavior better and explore the benefits of incorporating more human-like questions in multiturn conversations. Specifically, we directly target human questions extracted from genuine human-machine conversations as a learning goal and provide a novel user simulator called 'Socratic'. The experimental results show our response model, 'PlatoLM', achieves SoTA performance among LLaMA-based 7B models in MT-Bench. Our findings further demonstrate that our method introduces highly human-like questioning patterns and rich topic structures, which can teach the response model better than previous works in multi-round conversations.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers12
- Flipping the Dialogue: Training and Evaluating User Language ModelsTarek Naous, Philippe Laban, Wei Xu, Jennifer NevilleICLR 2026 · 56 citations
- Know You First and Be You Better: Modeling Human-Like User Simulators via Implicit ProfilesKuang Wang, Xianfei Li, Shenghao Yang, Li Zhou et al.ACL 2025 · 24 citations
- BIRD-INTERACT: Re-imagining Text-to-SQL Evaluation via Lens of Dynamic InteractionsNan Huo, Xiaohan Xu, Jinyang Li, Per Jacobsson et al.ICLR 2026 · 10 citations
- CAR-bench: Evaluating the Consistency and Limit-Awareness of LLM Agents under Real-World UncertaintyJohannes Kirmayr, Lukas Stappen, Elisabeth AndréACL 2026 · 5 citations
- XtraGPT: Context-Aware and Controllable Academic Paper Revision via Human-AI CollaborationNuo Chen, Andre Huikai Lin, Jiaying Wu, Junyi Hou et al.ACL 2026 · 3 citations
Builds on9
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMsTim Dettmers, Artidoro Pagnoni, Ari Holtzman, Luke ZettlemoyerNeurIPS 2023 · 5,863 citations
- LIMA: Less Is More for AlignmentChunting Zhou, Pengfei Liu, Puxin Xu, Srinivasan Iyer et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 1,486 citations
- AlpacaFarm: A Simulation Framework for Methods that Learn from Human FeedbackYann Dubois, Chen Xuechen Li, Rohan Taori, Tianyi Zhang et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 948 citations
Related papers
- Enhancing Chat Language Models by Scaling High-quality Instructional ConversationsNing Ding, Yulin Chen, Bokai Xu, Yujia Qin et al.EMNLP 2023 · 95 citations
- Baize: An Open-Source Chat Model with Parameter-Efficient Tuning on Self-Chat DataCanwen Xu, Daya Guo, Nan Duan, Julian J. McAuleyEMNLP 2023 · 112 citations
- HumanLM: Simulating Users with State Alignment Beats Response ImitationShirley Wu, Evelyn Choi, Arpandeep Khatua, Zhanghan Wang et al.ICML 2026
- A Computational Framework for Evaluating Human-likeness in LLMs' Open-ended Human BehaviorsYuxuan Lei, Jianxun Lian, Defu Lian, Jincenzi Wu et al.ICML 2026
- DMT-RoleBench: A Dynamic Multi-Turn Dialogue Based Benchmark for Role-Playing Evaluation of Large Language Model and AgentDingbo Yuan, Yipeng Chen, Guodong Liu, Chenchen Li et al.AAAI 2025 · 6 citations
