USENIX Security2017Top-tier venue
Postmortem Program Analysis with Hardware-Enhanced Post-Crash Artifacts
Jun Xu, Dongliang Mu, Xinyu Xing, Peng Liu, Ping Chen, Bing Mao
Abstract
While a core dump carries a large amount of information, it barely serves as informative debugging aids in locating software faults because it carries information that indicates only a partial chronology of how program reached a crash site. Recently, this situation has been significantly improved. With the emergence of hardwareassisted processor tracing, software developers and security analysts can trace program execution and integrate them into a core dump. In comparison with an ordinary core dump, the new post-crash artifact provides software developers and security analysts with more clues as to a program crash. To use it for failure diagnosis, however, it still requires strenuous manual efforts. In this work, we propose POMP, an automated tool to facilitate the analysis of post-crash artifacts. More specifically, POMP introduces a new reverse execution mechanism to construct the data flow that a program followed prior to its crash. By using the data flow, POMP then performs backward taint analysis and highlights those program statements that actually contribute to the crash. To demonstrate its effectiveness in pinpointing program statements truly pertaining to a program crash, we have implemented POMP for Linux system on x86-32 platform, and tested it against various program crashes resulting from 31 distinct real-world security vulnerabilities. We show that, POMP can accurately and efficiently pinpoint program statements that truly pertain to the crashes, making failure diagnosis significantly convenient.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 24177872-dca7-481e-ab97-da020dcbac47Cited by top-tier papers22
- Understanding the Reproducibility of Crowd-reported Security VulnerabilitiesDongliang Mu, Alejandro Cuevas, Limin Yang, Hang Hu et al.USENIX Security 2018 · 138 citations
- DEEPVSA: Facilitating Value-set Analysis with Deep Learning for Postmortem Program AnalysisWenbo Guo, Dongliang Mu, Xinyu Xing, Min Du et al.USENIX Security 2019 · 67 citations
- ARCUS: Symbolic Root Cause Analysis of Exploits in Production SystemsCarter Yagemann, Matthew Pruett, Simon P. Chung, Kennon Bittick et al.USENIX Security 2021 · 42 citations
- Understanding the Security of ARM Debugging FeaturesZhenyu Ning, Fengwei ZhangS&P 2019 · 41 citations
- Facilitating Vulnerability Assessment through PoC MigrationJiarun Dai, Yuan Zhang, Hailong Xu, Haiming Lyu et al.CCS 2021 · 26 citations
Builds on1
Related papers
- AURORA: Statistical Crash Analysis for Automated Root Cause ExplanationTim Blazytko, Moritz Schlögel, Cornelius Aschermann, Ali Abbasi et al.USENIX Security 2020
- Reverse Debugging of Kernel Failures in Deployed SystemsXinyang Ge, Ben Niu, Weidong CuiUSENIX ATC 2020 · 29 citations
- The Code That Never Ran: Modeling Attacks on Speculative EvaluationCraig Disselkoen, Radha Jagadeesan, Alan Jeffrey, James RielyS&P 2019 · 24 citations
- HardTaint: Production-Run Dynamic Taint Analysis via Selective Hardware TracingYiyu Zhang, Tianyi Liu, Yueyang Wang, Yun Qi et al.OOPSLA 2024 · 7 citations
- HeapHopper: Bringing Bounded Model Checking to Heap Implementation SecurityMoritz Eckert, Antonio Bianchi, Ruoyu Wang, Yan Shoshitaishvili et al.USENIX Security 2018 · 62 citations
