FedAPM: Federated Learning via ADMM with Partial Model Personalization
Shengkun Zhu, Feiteng Nie, Jinshan Zeng, Sheng Wang, Yuan Sun, Yuan Yao, Shangfeng Chen, Quanqing Xu, Chuanhui Yang
Abstract
In federated learning (FL), the assumption that datasets from different devices are independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) often does not hold due to user differences, and the presence of various data modalities across clients makes using a single model impractical. Personalizing certain parts of the model can effectively address these issues by allowing those parts to differ across clients, while the remaining parts serve as a shared model. However, we found that partial model personalization may exacerbate client drift (each client's local model diverges from the shared model), thereby reducing the effectiveness and efficiency of FL algorithms. We propose an FL framework based on the alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM), referred to as FedAPM, to mitigate client drift. We construct the augmented Lagrangian function by incorporating first-order and second-order proximal terms into the objective, with the second-order term providing fixed correction and the first-order term offering compensatory correction between the local and shared models. Our analysis demonstrates that FedAPM, by using explicit estimates of the Lagrange multiplier, is more stable and efficient in terms of convergence compared to other FL frameworks. We establish the global convergence of FedAPM training from arbitrary initial points to a stationary point, achieving three types of rates: constant, linear, and sublinear, under mild assumptions. We conduct experiments using four heterogeneous and multimodal datasets with different metrics to validate the performance of FedAPM. Specifically, FedAPM achieves faster and more accurate convergence, outperforming the SOTA methods with average improvements of 12.3% in test accuracy, 16.4% in F1 score, and 18.0% in AUC while requiring fewer communication rounds.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers2
- PPFL: A Parameter Behavior-Driven Plug-in Personalization Engine for Federated LearningQianyue Cao, Zongwei Zhu, Zirui Lian, Rui Zhang et al.AAAI 2026
- Homophily-Heterogeneity Gradient Surgery for Federated Graph LearningSujia Huang, Lele Fu, Shunxin Xiao, Xiaoya Zhang et al.ICML 2026
Builds on18
- SCAFFOLD: Stochastic Controlled Averaging for Federated LearningSai Praneeth Karimireddy, Satyen Kale, Mehryar Mohri, Sashank J. Reddi et al.ICML 2020 · 3,875 citations
- Personalized Federated Learning with Moreau EnvelopesCanh T. Dinh, Nguyen Hoang Tran, Tuan Dung NguyenNeurIPS 2020 · 1,542 citations
- Ditto: Fair and Robust Federated Learning Through PersonalizationTian Li, Shengyuan Hu, Ahmad Beirami, Virginia SmithICML 2021 · 1,313 citations
- Federated Learning on Non-IID Data Silos: An Experimental StudyQinbin Li, Yiqun Diao, Quan Chen, Bingsheng HeICDE 2022 · 1,110 citations
- Exploiting Shared Representations for Personalized Federated LearningLiam Collins, Hamed Hassani, Aryan Mokhtari, Sanjay ShakkottaiICML 2021 · 1,081 citations
Related papers
- Federated Learning with Partial Model PersonalizationKrishna Pillutla, Kshitiz Malik, Abdelrahman Mohamed, Michael G. Rabbat et al.ICML 2022 · 229 citations
- FedDC: Federated Learning with Non-IID Data via Local Drift Decoupling and CorrectionLiang Gao, Huazhu Fu, Li Li, Yingwen Chen et al.CVPR 2022 · 307 citations
- Decentralized Directed Collaboration for Personalized Federated LearningYingqi Liu, Yifan Shi, Baoyuan Wu, Qinglun Li et al.CVPR 2024
- Anchor Sampling for Federated Learning with Partial Client ParticipationFeijie Wu, Song Guo, Zhihao Qu, Shiqi He et al.ICML 2023 · 27 citations
- Breaking the centralized barrier for cross-device federated learningSai Praneeth Karimireddy, Martin Jaggi, Satyen Kale, Mehryar Mohri et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 113 citations
