Attention as Implicit Structural Inference
Ryan Singh, Christopher L. Buckley
Abstract
Attention mechanisms play a crucial role in cognitive systems by allowing them to flexibly allocate cognitive resources. Transformers, in particular, have become a dominant architecture in machine learning, with attention as their central innovation. However, the underlying intuition and formalism of attention in Transformers is based on ideas of keys and queries in database management systems. In this work, we pursue a structural inference perspective, building upon, and bringing together, previous theoretical descriptions of attention such as; Gaussian Mixture Models, alignment mechanisms and Hopfield Networks. Specifically, we demonstrate that attention can be viewed as inference over an implicitly defined set of possible adjacency structures in a graphical model, revealing the generality of such a mechanism. This perspective unifies different attentional architectures in machine learning and suggests potential modifications and generalizations of attention. Here we investigate two and demonstrate their behaviour on explanatory toy problems: (a) extending the value function to incorporate more nodes of a graphical model yielding a mechanism with a bias toward attending multiple tokens; (b) introducing a geometric prior (with conjugate hyper-prior) over the adjacency structures producing a mechanism which dynamically scales the context window depending on input. Moreover, by describing a link between structural inference and precision-regulation in Predictive Coding Networks, we discuss how this framework can bridge the gap between attentional mechanisms in machine learning and Bayesian conceptions of attention in Neuroscience. We hope by providing a new lens on attention architectures our work can guide the development of new and improved attentional mechanisms.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers3
- Hierarchical Self-Attention: Generalizing Neural Attention Mechanics to Multi-Scale ProblemsSaeed Amizadeh, Sara Abdali, Yinheng Li, Kazuhito KoishidaNeurIPS 2025 · 2 citations
- On the Infinite Width and Depth Limits of Predictive Coding NetworksFrancesco Innocenti, El Mehdi Achour, Rafal BogaczICML 2026
- NetFormer: An interpretable model for recovering dynamical connectivity in neuronal population dynamicsZiyu Lu, Wuwei Zhang, Trung Le, Hao Wang et al.ICLR 2025
Builds on15
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at ScaleAlexey Dosovitskiy, Lucas Beyer, Alexander Kolesnikov, Dirk Weissenborn et al.ICLR 2021 · 21,477 citations
- Object-Centric Learning with Slot AttentionFrancesco Locatello, Dirk Weissenborn, Thomas Unterthiner, Aravindh Mahendran et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 1,275 citations
- What Can Transformers Learn In-Context? A Case Study of Simple Function ClassesShivam Garg, Dimitris Tsipras, Percy Liang, Gregory ValiantNeurIPS 2022 · 883 citations
- Transformers Learn In-Context by Gradient DescentJohannes von Oswald, Eyvind Niklasson, Ettore Randazzo, João Sacramento et al.ICML 2023 · 729 citations
Related papers
- Constrained Belief Updates Explain Geometric Structures in Transformer RepresentationsMateusz Piotrowski, Paul M. Riechers, Daniel Filan, Adam S. ShaiICML 2025
- On the Role of Hidden States of Modern Hopfield Network in TransformerTsubasa Masumura, Masato TakiNeurIPS 2025 · 2 citations
- Implicit Kernel AttentionKyungwoo Song, Yohan Jung, Dongjun Kim, Il-Chul MoonAAAI 2021 · 18 citations
- Transformer brain encoders explain human high-level visual responsesHossein Adeli, Minni Sun, Nikolaus KriegeskorteNeurIPS 2025 · 14 citations
- Controlled Dynamics Attractor TransformerCheng Zhang, Minnan Luo, Zesheng Yang, Ming Li et al.ICML 2026
