MoT: Modularization-of-Thought Prompting for Effective Code Generation
Ruwei Pan, Hongyu Zhang
Abstract
Large Language Models are transforming software development by automatically generating code. Current prompting techniques such as Chain-of-Thought (CoT) suggest tasks step by step and the reasoning process follows a linear structure, which hampers the understanding of complex programming problems, particularly those requiring hierarchical solutions. Inspired by the principle of modularization in software development, in this work, we propose a novel prompting technique called MoT (Modularization of Thought), to enhance the code generation performance of LLMs. First, MoT exploits modularization principles to decompose complex programming problems into smaller, independent reasoning steps, enabling a more structured and interpretable problem-solving process. This hierarchical structure improves the LLMs' ability to comprehend complex programming problems. Then, it structures the reasoning process using an MLR Graph (Multi-Level Reasoning Graph), which hierarchically organizes reasoning steps. This approach enhances modular understanding and ensures better alignment between reasoning steps and the generated code, significantly improving code generation performance. Our experiments on two advanced LLMs (GPT-4o-mini and DeepSeek-R1), comparing MoT to six baseline prompting techniques across eight benchmarks, demonstrate that MoT significantly outperforms existing baselines (e.g., CoT and SCoT), achieving Pass@1 scores ranging from 58.1% to 95.1%.
CCS Concepts: • Software and its engineering → Automatic programming.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 2381316a-b897-4a5f-9002-2310d3247ee5Builds on20
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language ModelsShunyu Yao, Dian Yu, Jeffrey Zhao, Izhak Shafran et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 5,068 citations
- Is Your Code Generated by ChatGPT Really Correct? Rigorous Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code GenerationJiawei Liu, Chunqiu Steven Xia, Yuyao Wang, Lingming ZhangNeurIPS 2023 · 2,317 citations
- Graph of Thoughts: Solving Elaborate Problems with Large Language ModelsMaciej Besta, Nils Blach, Ales Kubicek, Robert Gerstenberger et al.AAAI 2024 · 1,292 citations
Related papers
- Decomposed Prompting: A Modular Approach for Solving Complex TasksTushar Khot, Harsh Trivedi, Matthew Finlayson, Yao Fu et al.ICLR 2023 · 94 citations
- Fixing Large Language Models' Specification Misunderstanding for Better Code GenerationZhao Tian, Junjie Chen, Xiangyu ZhangICSE 2025 · 6 citations
- Revisiting Chain-of-Thought in Code Generation: Do Language Models Need to Learn Reasoning before Coding?Renbiao Liu, Anqi Li, Chaoding Yang, Hui Sun et al.ICML 2025
- CodeChain: Towards Modular Code Generation Through Chain of Self-revisions with Representative Sub-modulesHung Le, Hailin Chen, Amrita Saha, Akash Gokul et al.ICLR 2024 · 73 citations
- Intention Chain-of-Thought Prompting with Dynamic Routing for Code GenerationShen Li, Li Huang, Shaoxiong Zhan, Weifeng Sun et al.AAAI 2026 · 1 citation
