Bridging Continuous and Discrete Spaces: Interpretable Sentence Representation Learning via Compositional Operations
James Y. Huang, Wenlin Yao, Kaiqiang Song, Hongming Zhang, Muhao Chen, Dong Yu
Abstract
Traditional sentence embedding models encode sentences into vector representations to capture useful properties such as the semantic similarity between sentences. However, in addition to similarity, sentence semantics can also be interpreted via compositional operations such as sentence fusion or difference. It is unclear whether the compositional semantics of sentences can be directly reflected as compositional operations in the embedding space. To more effectively bridge the continuous embedding and discrete text spaces, we explore the plausibility of incorporating various compositional properties into the sentence embedding space that allows us to interpret embedding transformations as compositional sentence operations. We propose INTERSENT, an end-toend framework for learning interpretable sentence embeddings that supports compositional sentence operations in the embedding space. Our method optimizes operator networks and a bottleneck encoder-decoder model to produce meaningful and interpretable sentence embeddings. Experimental results demonstrate that our method significantly improves the interpretability of sentence embeddings on four textual generation tasks over existing approaches while maintaining strong performance on traditional semantic similarity tasks. 1 .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 2358ade2-33ea-4722-a40d-880b85d812d5Cited by top-tier papers2
- Interpretable Text Embeddings and Text Similarity Explanation: A SurveyJuri Opitz, Lucas Möller, Andrianos Michail, Sebastian Padó et al.EMNLP 2025 · 3 citations
- Triple-Encoders: Representations That Fire Together, Wire TogetherJustus-Jonas Erker, Florian Mai, Nils Reimers, Gerasimos Spanakis et al.ACL 2024
Builds on8
- SimCSE: Simple Contrastive Learning of Sentence EmbeddingsTianyu Gao, Xingcheng Yao, Danqi ChenEMNLP 2021 · 2,496 citations
- Baleen: Robust Multi-Hop Reasoning at Scale via Condensed RetrievalOmar Khattab, Christopher Potts, Matei A. ZahariaNeurIPS 2021 · 92 citations
- Assessing Phrasal Representation and Composition in TransformersLang Yu, Allyson EttingerEMNLP 2020 · 60 citations
- Are representations built from the ground up? An empirical examination of local composition in language modelsEmmy Liu, Graham NeubigEMNLP 2022 · 5 citations
- Sentence Representation Learning with Generative Objective rather than Contrastive ObjectiveBohong Wu, Hai ZhaoEMNLP 2022 · 3 citations
Related papers
- A Bilingual Generative Transformer for Semantic Sentence EmbeddingJohn Wieting, Graham Neubig, Taylor Berg-KirkpatrickEMNLP 2020 · 4 citations
- Static Word Embeddings for Sentence Semantic RepresentationTakashi Wada, Yuki Hirakawa, Ryotaro Shimizu, Takahiro Kawashima et al.EMNLP 2025 · 1 citation
- On the Sentence Embeddings from Pre-trained Language ModelsBohan Li, Hao Zhou, Junxian He, Mingxuan Wang et al.EMNLP 2020 · 538 citations
- SentiBERT: A Transferable Transformer-Based Architecture for Compositional Sentiment SemanticsDa Yin, Tao Meng, Kai-Wei ChangACL 2020 · 127 citations
- SetCSE: Set Operations using Contrastive Learning of Sentence EmbeddingsKang LiuICLR 2024 · 5 citations
