Multi-Agent Coordination via Multi-Level Communication
Gang Ding, Zeyuan Liu, Zhirui Fang, Kefan Su, Liwen Zhu, Zongqing Lu
Abstract
The partial observability and stochasticity in multi-agent settings can be mitigated by accessing more information about others via communication. However, the coordination problem still exists since agents cannot communicate actual actions with each other at the same time due to the circular dependencies. In this paper, we propose a novel multi-level communication scheme, Sequential Communication (SeqComm). SeqComm treats agents asynchronously (the upper-level agents make decisions before the lower-level ones) and has two communication phases. In the negotiation phase, agents determine the priority of decision-making by communicating hidden states of observations and comparing the value of intention, obtained by modeling the environment dynamics. In the launching phase, the upper-level agents take the lead in making decisions and then communicate their actions with the lower-level agents. Theoretically, we prove the policies learned by SeqComm are guaranteed to improve monotonically and converge. Empirically, we show that SeqComm outperforms existing methods in various cooperative multi-agent tasks.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 234fa291-3a21-47ae-b016-ec8c44fc0d57Cited by top-tier papers5
- Heterogeneous Swarms: Jointly Optimizing Model Roles and Weights for Multi-LLM SystemsShangbin Feng, Zifeng Wang, Palash Goyal, Yike Wang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 26 citations
- Empowering Multi-Robot Cooperation via Sequential World ModelsZijie Zhao, Honglei Guo, Shengqian Chen, Kaixuan Xu et al.ICLR 2026 · 16 citations
- From Capabilities to Performance: Evaluating Key Functional Properties of LLM Architectures in Penetration TestingLanxiao Huang, Daksh Dave, Tyler Cody, Peter A. Beling et al.EMNLP 2025 · 1 citation
- IEC: When Information-Driven Exploration Meets Spectral Consensus via Primal–Dual Reward Regularization in Decentralized Multi-Agent RLXuefeng Du, Jiajun Wu, Yuduo Zheng, Fengqi LiICML 2026
- GRDC: A Unified Graph-Driven Framework for Role Discovery and Communication in Multi-Agent Reinforcement LearningZihong Gao, Hongjian Liang, Yuanhui Hao, Lei Hao et al.AAAI 2026
Builds on6
- Graph Convolutional Reinforcement LearningJiechuan Jiang, Chen Dun, Tiejun Huang, Zongqing LuICLR 2020 · 415 citations
- Deep Coordination GraphsWendelin Boehmer, Vitaly Kurin, Shimon WhitesonICML 2020 · 209 citations
- Learning Individually Inferred Communication for Multi-Agent CooperationZiluo Ding, Tiejun Huang, Zongqing LuNeurIPS 2020 · 146 citations
- Communication in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning: Intention SharingWoojun Kim, Jongeui Park, Youngchul SungICLR 2021 · 116 citations
- Iterated Reasoning with Mutual Information in Cooperative and Byzantine Decentralized TeamingSachin G. Konan, Esmaeil Seraj, Matthew C. GombolayICLR 2022 · 27 citations
Related papers
- Dec-SGTS: Decentralized Sub-Goal Tree Search for Multi-Agent CoordinationMinglong Li, Zhongxuan Cai, Wenjing Yang, Lixia Wu et al.AAAI 2021 · 4 citations
- LLM-Guided Communication for Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement LearningSangjun Bae, Yisak Park, Sanghyeon Lee, Seungyul HanICML 2026 · 2 citations
- Distributed Bandits with Heterogeneous AgentsLin Yang, Yu-Zhen Janice Chen, Mohammad Hassan Hajiesmaili, John C. S. Lui et al.INFOCOM 2022 · 12 citations
- Learning Multi-Agent Communication with Contrastive LearningYat Long Lo, Biswa Sengupta, Jakob Nicolaus Foerster, Michael NoukhovitchICLR 2024 · 11 citations
- Multi-Agent Incentive Communication via Decentralized Teammate ModelingLei Yuan, Jianhao Wang, Fuxiang Zhang, Chenghe Wang et al.AAAI 2022 · 104 citations
