Model Provenance Testing for Large Language Models
Ivica Nikolic, Teodora Baluta, Prateek Saxena
Abstract
Large language models are increasingly customized through fine-tuning and other adaptations, creating challenges in enforcing licensing terms and managing downstream impacts. Tracking model origins is crucial both for protecting intellectual property and for identifying derived models when biases or vulnerabilities are discovered in foundation models. We address this challenge by developing a framework for testing model provenance: Whether one model is derived from another. Our approach is based on the key observation that real-world model derivations preserve significant similarities in model outputs that can be detected through statistical analysis. Using only black-box access to models, we employ multiple hypothesis testing to compare model similarities against a baseline established by unrelated models. On two comprehensive real-world benchmarks spanning models from 30M to 4B parameters and comprising over 600 models, our tester achieves 90-95% precision and 80-90% recall in identifying derived models. These results demonstrate the viability of systematic provenance verification in production environments even when only API access is available.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 230ee6ae-3036-4c31-bdec-ab5e1a90907aCited by top-tier papers8
- LLM DNA: Tracing Model Evolution via Functional RepresentationsZhaomin Wu, Haodong Zhao, Ziyang Wang, Jizhou Guo et al.ICLR 2026 · 21 citations
- Unlearning Isn't Invisible: Detecting Unlearning Traces in LLMs from Model OutputsYiwei Chen, Soumyadeep Pal, Yimeng Zhang, Qing Qu et al.ICLR 2026 · 15 citations
- Blackbox Model Provenance via Palimpsestic Membership InferenceRohith Kuditipudi, Jing Huang, Sally Zhu, Diyi Yang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 12 citations
- ZipLLM: Efficient LLM Storage via Model-Aware Synergistic Data Deduplication and CompressionZirui Wang, Tingfeng Lan, Zhaoyuan Su, Juncheng Yang et al.NSDI 2026 · 8 citations
- Fingerprinting LLMs via Prompt InjectionYuepeng Hu, Zhengyuan Jiang, Mengyuan Li, Osama Ahmed et al.ACL 2026 · 3 citations
Builds on29
- Stealing Machine Learning Models via Prediction APIsFlorian Tramèr, Fan Zhang, Ari Juels, Michael K. Reiter et al.USENIX Security 2016 · 2,088 citations
- DetectGPT: Zero-Shot Machine-Generated Text Detection using Probability CurvatureEric Mitchell, Yoonho Lee, Alexander Khazatsky, Christopher D. Manning et al.ICML 2023 · 988 citations
- Many-shot JailbreakingCem Anil, Esin Durmus, Nina Panickssery, Mrinank Sharma et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 338 citations
- Poisoning Web-Scale Training Datasets is PracticalNicholas Carlini, Matthew Jagielski, Christopher A. Choquette-Choo, Daniel Paleka et al.S&P 2024 · 309 citations
- Entangled Watermarks as a Defense against Model ExtractionHengrui Jia, Christopher A. Choquette-Choo, Varun Chandrasekaran, Nicolas PapernotUSENIX Security 2021 · 287 citations
Related papers
- ErrorTrace: A Black-Box Traceability Mechanism Based on Model Family Error SpaceChuanchao Zang, Xiangtao Meng, Wenyu Chen, Tianshuo Cong et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 4 citations
- Matching Pairs: Attributing Fine-Tuned Models to their Pre-Trained Large Language ModelsMyles Foley, Ambrish Rawat, Taesung Lee, Yufang Hou et al.ACL 2023 · 2 citations
- Identifying Provenance of Generative Text-to-Image ModelsAnna Yoo Jeong Ha, Wenxin Ding, Stanley Wu, Shawn Shan et al.USENIX Security 2026
- Auditing Data Provenance in LLM Fine-tuning via Intrinsic Distributional FingerprintsZirui Huang, Yunlong Mao, Wei Tong, Tingting Wu et al.CCS 2026
- Tracking the Copyright of Large Vision-Language Models through Parameter Learning Adversarial ImagesYubo Wang, Jianting Tang, Chaohu Liu, Linli XuICLR 2025
