Uncovering the Redundancy in Graph Self-supervised Learning Models
Zhibiao Wang, Xiao Wang, Haoyue Deng, Nian Liu, Shirui Pan, Chunming Hu
Abstract
Graph self-supervised learning, as a powerful pre-training paradigm for Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) without labels, has received considerable attention. We have witnessed the success of graph self-supervised learning on pre-training the parameters of GNNs, leading many not to doubt that whether the learned GNNs parameters are all useful. In this paper, by presenting the experimental evidence and analysis, we surprisingly discover that the graph self-supervised learning models are highly redundant at both of neuron and layer levels, e.g., even randomly removing 51 . 6% of parameters, the performance of graph self-supervised learning models still retains at least 96 . 2% . This discovery implies that the parameters of graph self-supervised models can be largely reduced, making simultaneously fine-tuning both graph self-supervised learning models and prediction layers more feasible. Therefore, we further design a novel graph pre-training and fine-tuning paradigm called SLImming DE-correlation Fine-tuning (SLIDE 2 ). The effectiveness of SLIDE is verified through extensive experiments on various benchmarks, and the performance can be even improved with fewer parameters of models in most cases. For example, in comparison with full fine-tuning GraphMAE on Amazon-Computers dataset, even randomly reducing 40% of parameters, we can still achieve the improvement of 0 . 24% and 0 . 27% for Micro-F1 and Macro-F1 scores respectively.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers2
- Adaptive and Context-rich Generative Self-supervised Learning on GraphsYijun Tian, Chuxu Zhang, Ziyi Kou, Zheyuan Liu et al.AAAI 2026
- Frequency-Corrupt Based Graph Self-Supervised LearningHaojie Li, Mengjiao Zhang, Guanfeng Liu, Qiang Hu et al.WWW 2026
Builds on19
- Open Graph Benchmark: Datasets for Machine Learning on GraphsWeihua Hu, Matthias Fey, Marinka Zitnik, Yuxiao Dong et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 3,935 citations
- Graph Contrastive Learning with AugmentationsYuning You, Tianlong Chen, Yongduo Sui, Ting Chen et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 3,042 citations
- Contrastive Multi-View Representation Learning on GraphsKaveh Hassani, Amir Hosein Khas AhmadiICML 2020 · 1,663 citations
- Graph Contrastive Learning with Adaptive AugmentationYanqiao Zhu, Yichen Xu, Feng Yu, Qiang Liu et al.WWW 2021 · 1,415 citations
- InfoGraph: Unsupervised and Semi-supervised Graph-Level Representation Learning via Mutual Information MaximizationFan-Yun Sun, Jordan Hoffmann, Vikas Verma, Jian TangICLR 2020 · 1,010 citations
Related papers
- GPPT: Graph Pre-training and Prompt Tuning to Generalize Graph Neural NetworksMingchen Sun, Kaixiong Zhou, Xin He, Ying Wang et al.KDD 2022 · 141 citations
- Adaptive Transfer Learning on Graph Neural NetworksXueting Han, Zhenhuan Huang, Bang An, Jing BaiKDD 2021 · 30 citations
- Edge Prompt Tuning for Graph Neural NetworksXingbo Fu, Yinhan He, Jundong LiICLR 2025 · 140 citations
- GPT-GNN: Generative Pre-Training of Graph Neural NetworksZiniu Hu, Yuxiao Dong, Kuansan Wang, Kai-Wei Chang et al.KDD 2020 · 438 citations
- Exploring Correlations of Self-Supervised Tasks for GraphsTaoran Fang, Wei Chow, Yifei Sun, Kaiqiao Han et al.ICML 2024 · 12 citations
