Privacy in Human-AI Romantic Relationships: Concerns, Boundaries, and Agency
Rongjun Ma, Shijing He, Jose Luis Martin-Navarro, Xiao Zhan, Jose Such
Abstract
An increasing number of LLM-based applications are being developed to facilitate romantic relationships with AI partners, yet the safety and privacy risks in these partnerships remain largely underexplored. In this work, we investigate privacy in human-AI romantic relationships through an interview study (N=17), examining participants' experiences and privacy perceptions across the three stages of exploration, intimacy, and dissolution, alongside an analysis of the platforms they used. We found that these relationships took varied forms, from one-to-one to one-to-many, and were shaped by multiple actors, including creators, platforms, and moderators. AI partners were perceived as having agency, actively negotiating privacy boundaries with participants and sometimes encouraging disclosure of personal details. As intimacy deepened, these boundaries became more permeable, though some participants expressed concerns such as conversation exposure and sought to preserve anonymity. Overall, AI platform affordances and diverse relational dynamics expand the privacy landscape, underscoring the need to rethink how privacy is constructed in human-AI romantic relationships.
• Security and privacy → Social aspects of security and privacy.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 22a2b6d2-d2c3-4548-a928-bae8e35e72e6Builds on16
- Extracting Training Data from Large Language ModelsNicholas Carlini, Florian Tramèr, Eric Wallace, Matthew Jagielski et al.USENIX Security 2021 · 2,866 citations
- ProPILE: Probing Privacy Leakage in Large Language ModelsSiwon Kim, Sangdoo Yun, Hwaran Lee, Martin Gubri et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 229 citations
- How the Design of YouTube Influences User Sense of AgencyKai Lukoff, Ulrik Lyngs, Himanshu Zade, J. Vera Liao et al.CHI 2021 · 177 citations
- The Dark Side of AI Companionship: A Taxonomy of Harmful Algorithmic Behaviors in Human-AI RelationshipsRenwen Zhang, Han Li, Han Meng, Jinyuan Zhan et al.CHI 2025 · 122 citations
- "It's a Fair Game", or Is It? Examining How Users Navigate Disclosure Risks and Benefits When Using LLM-Based Conversational AgentsZhiping Zhang, Michelle Jia, Hao-Ping (Hank) Lee, Bingsheng Yao et al.CHI 2024 · 92 citations
Related papers
- 'My Dataset of Love': A Preliminary Mixed-Method Exploration of Human-AI Romantic RelationshipsXuetong Wang, Ching Christie Pang, Pan HuiCSCW 2025 · 16 citations
- Privacy Perceptions of Custom GPTs by Users and CreatorsRongjun Ma, Caterina Maidhof, Juan Carlos Carrillo, Janne Lindqvist et al.CHI 2025 · 35 citations
- Privacy Control in Conversational LLM Platforms: A Walkthrough StudyZhuoyang Li, Yanlai Wu, Yao Li, Xinning Gui et al.CHI 2026 · 1 citation
- Caught in a Mafia Romance: How Users Explore Intimate Narratives with ChatbotsJulia B. Kieserman, Cat Mai, Sara Lignell, Lucy Qin et al.CHI 2026 · 1 citation
- Does My Chatbot Have an Agenda? Understanding Human and AI Agency in Human-Human-like Chatbot InteractionBhada Yun, Evgenia Taranova, April Yi WangCHI 2026 · 3 citations
