PAC-Bayesian Bounds on Rate-Efficient Classifiers
Alhabib Abbas, Yiannis Andreopoulos
Abstract
We derive analytic bounds on the noise invariance of majority vote classifiers operating on compressed inputs. Specifically, starting from recent bounds on the true risk of majority vote classifiers, we extend the applicability of PAC-Bayesian theory to quantify the resilience of majority votes to input noise stemming from compression. The derived bounds are intuitive in binary classification settings, where they can be measured as expressions of voter differentials and voter pair agreement. By combining measures of input distortion with analytic guarantees on noise invariance, we prescribe rate-efficient machines to compress inputs without affecting subsequent classification. Our validation shows how bounding noise invariance can inform the compression stage for any majority vote classifier such that worst-case implications of bad input reconstructions are known, and inputs can be compressed to the minimum amount of information needed prior to inference. 1. We introduce the notion of rate-efficient classifiers to PAC-Bayesian theory, and derive relevant expressions of noise-invariance to define such classifiers. 2. We derive unsupervised general bounds on noiseinvariance, and specialize them to binary majority vote classifiers comprising linear kernels. 3. We combine noise-invariance bounds with measures of reconstruction loss to realize rate-efficient machines that bound errors resulting from lossy compression.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 224bcac6-df73-44b9-965b-4fa56b356adeBuilds on2
Related papers
- Learning Stochastic Majority Votes by Minimizing a PAC-Bayes Generalization BoundValentina Zantedeschi, Paul Viallard, Emilie Morvant, Rémi Emonet et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 21 citations
- On Margins and Generalisation for Voting ClassifiersFelix Biggs, Valentina Zantedeschi, Benjamin GuedjNeurIPS 2022 · 10 citations
- Information-Theoretic Understanding of Population Risk Improvement with Model CompressionYuheng Bu, Weihao Gao, Shaofeng Zou, Venugopal V. VeeravalliAAAI 2020 · 18 citations
- Don't Label Twice: Quantity Beats Quality when Comparing Binary Classifiers on a BudgetFlorian E. Dorner, Moritz HardtICML 2024 · 10 citations
- Second Order PAC-Bayesian Bounds for the Weighted Majority VoteAndrés R. Masegosa, Stephan Sloth Lorenzen, Christian Igel, Yevgeny SeldinNeurIPS 2020 · 48 citations
