Adversarial training for high-stakes reliability
Daniel M. Ziegler, Seraphina Nix, Lawrence Chan, Tim Bauman, Peter Schmidt-Nielsen, Tao Lin, Adam Scherlis, Noa Nabeshima, Ben Weinstein-Raun, Daniel de Haas, Buck Shlegeris, Nate Thomas
Abstract
In the future, powerful AI systems may be deployed in high-stakes settings, where a single failure could be catastrophic. One technique for improving AI safety in high-stakes settings is adversarial training, which uses an adversary to generate examples to train on in order to achieve better worst-case performance. In this work, we used a safe language generation task (``avoid injuries'') as a testbed for achieving high reliability through adversarial training. We created a series of adversarial training techniques -- including a tool that assists human adversaries -- to find and eliminate failures in a classifier that filters text completions suggested by a generator. In our task, we determined that we can set very conservative classifier thresholds without significantly impacting the quality of the filtered outputs. We found that adversarial training increased robustness to the adversarial attacks that we trained on -- doubling the time for our contractors to find adversarial examples both with our tool (from 13 to 26 minutes) and without (from 20 to 44 minutes) -- without affecting in-distribution performance. We hope to see further work in the high-stakes reliability setting, including more powerful tools for enhancing human adversaries and better ways to measure high levels of reliability, until we can confidently rule out the possibility of catastrophic deployment-time failures of powerful models.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers17
- The Alignment Problem from a Deep Learning PerspectiveRichard Ngo, Lawrence Chan, Sören MindermannICLR 2024 · 296 citations
- Pretraining Language Models with Human PreferencesTomasz Korbak, Kejian Shi, Angelica Chen, Rasika Vinayak Bhalerao et al.ICML 2023 · 287 citations
- Secret Collusion among AI Agents: Multi-Agent Deception via SteganographySumeet Ramesh Motwani, Mikhail Baranchuk, Martin Strohmeier, Vijay Bolina et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 140 citations
- Aligning Language Models with Preferences through f-divergence MinimizationDongyoung Go, Tomasz Korbak, Germán Kruszewski, Jos Rozen et al.ICML 2023 · 119 citations
- Deep Ignorance: Filtering Pretraining Data Builds Tamper-Resistant Safeguards into Open-Weight LLMsKyle O'Brien, Stephen Casper, Quentin Anthony, Tomek Korbak et al.ICLR 2026 · 59 citations
Builds on15
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Deberta: decoding-Enhanced Bert with Disentangled AttentionPengcheng He, Xiaodong Liu, Jianfeng Gao, Weizhu ChenICLR 2021 · 3,729 citations
- Adversarial NLI: A New Benchmark for Natural Language UnderstandingYixin Nie, Adina Williams, Emily Dinan, Mohit Bansal et al.ACL 2020 · 602 citations
- DeBERTaV3: Improving DeBERTa using ELECTRA-Style Pre-Training with Gradient-Disentangled Embedding SharingPengcheng He, Jianfeng Gao, Weizhu ChenICLR 2023 · 394 citations
Related papers
- Improving Alignment and Robustness with Circuit BreakersAndy Zou, Long Phan, Justin Wang, Derek Duenas et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 362 citations
- MixAT: Combining Continuous and Discrete Adversarial Training for LLMsCsaba Dékány, Stefan Balauca, Dimitar I. Dimitrov, Robin Staab et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 12 citations
- ATGen: Adversarial Reinforcement Learning for Test Case GenerationQingyao Li, Xinyi Dai, Weiwen Liu, Xiangyang Li et al.ICLR 2026 · 4 citations
- Reinforcement Learning with Backtracking FeedbackBilgehan Sel, Vaishakh Keshava, Phillip Wallis, Lukas Rutishauser et al.NeurIPS 2025
- "That Is a Suspicious Reaction!": Interpreting Logits Variation to Detect NLP Adversarial AttacksEdoardo Mosca, Shreyash Agarwal, Javier Rando-Ramirez, Georg GrohACL 2022 · 43 citations
