SureMap: Simultaneous mean estimation for single-task and multi-task disaggregated evaluation
Misha Khodak, Lester Mackey, Alexandra Chouldechova, Miro Dudík
Abstract
Disaggregated evaluation -- estimation of performance of a machine learning model on different subpopulations -- is a core task when assessing performance and group-fairness of AI systems. A key challenge is that evaluation data is scarce, and subpopulations arising from intersections of attributes (e.g., race, sex, age) are often tiny. Today, it is common for multiple clients to procure the same AI model from a model developer, and the task of disaggregated evaluation is faced by each customer individually. This gives rise to what we call the multi-task disaggregated evaluation problem, wherein multiple clients seek to conduct a disaggregated evaluation of a given model in their own data setting (task). In this work we develop a disaggregated evaluation method called SureMap that has high estimation accuracy for both multi-task and single-task disaggregated evaluations of blackbox models. SureMap's efficiency gains come from (1) transforming the problem into structured simultaneous Gaussian mean estimation and (2) incorporating external data, e.g., from the AI system creator or from their other clients. Our method combines maximum a posteriori (MAP) estimation using a well-chosen prior together with cross-validation-free tuning via Stein's unbiased risk estimate (SURE). We evaluate SureMap on disaggregated evaluation tasks in multiple domains, observing significant accuracy improvements over several strong competitors.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 21c5ca03-3dde-4107-a841-3a750e1d845dBuilds on3
- Robust Speech Recognition via Large-Scale Weak SupervisionAlec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Tao Xu, Greg Brockman et al.ICML 2023 · 6,966 citations
- Retiring Adult: New Datasets for Fair Machine LearningFrances Ding, Moritz Hardt, John Miller, Ludwig SchmidtNeurIPS 2021 · 671 citations
- Active Assessment of Prediction Services as Accuracy Surface Over Attribute CombinationsVihari Piratla, Soumen Chakrabarti, Sunita SarawagiNeurIPS 2021 · 4 citations
Related papers
- Assessing the Fairness of AI Systems: AI Practitioners' Processes, Challenges, and Needs for SupportMichael Madaio, Lisa Egede, Hariharan Subramonyam, Jennifer Wortman Vaughan et al.CSCW 2022 · 149 citations
- Understanding challenges to the interpretation of disaggregated evaluations of algorithmic fairnessStephen Pfohl, Natalie Harris, Chirag Nagpal, David Madras et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 9 citations
- Estimating Structural Disparities for Face ModelsShervin Ardeshir, Cristina Segalin, Nathan KallusCVPR 2022 · 2 citations
- Evaluating multiple models using labeled and unlabeled dataDivya Shanmugam, Shuvom Sadhuka, Manish Raghavan, John V. Guttag et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 9 citations
- Individual Arbitrariness and Group FairnessCarol Xuan Long, Hsiang Hsu, Wael Alghamdi, Flávio P. CalmonNeurIPS 2023 · 16 citations
