Automatically Interpreting Millions of Features in Large Language Models
Gonçalo Paulo, Alex Mallen, Caden Juang, Nora Belrose
Abstract
While the activations of neurons in deep neural networks usually do not have a simple human-understandable interpretation, sparse autoencoders (SAEs) can be used to transform these activations into a higher-dimensional latent space which can be more easily interpretable. However, SAEs can have millions of distinct features, making it infeasible for humans to manually interpret each one. In this work, we build an open-source automated pipeline to generate and evaluate natural language interpretations for SAE features using LLMs. We test our framework on SAEs of varying sizes, activation functions, and losses, trained on two different open-weight LLMs. We introduce five new techniques to score the quality of interpretations that are cheaper to run than the previous state of the art. One of these techniques, intervention scoring, evaluates the interpretability of the effects of intervening on a feature, which we find explains features that are not recalled by existing methods. We propose guidelines for generating better interpretations that remain valid for a broader set of activating contexts, and discuss pitfalls with existing scoring techniques. Our code is available online.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 21b59ac1-5651-4580-89e6-94daae8465ecCited by top-tier papers51
- Sparse Autoencoders Trained on the Same Data Learn Different FeaturesGonçalo Paulo, Nora BelroseICLR 2026 · 96 citations
- Activation Oracles: Training and Evaluating LLMs as General-Purpose Activation ExplainersAdam Karvonen, James Chua, Clément Dumas, Kit Fraser-Taliente et al.ICML 2026 · 42 citations
- Automated Interpretability Metrics Do Not Distinguish Trained and Random TransformersThomas Heap, Tim Lawson, Lucy Farnik, Laurence AitchisonICLR 2026 · 32 citations
- Steering Out-of-Distribution Generalization with Concept Ablation Fine-TuningHelena Casademunt, Caden Juang, Adam Karvonen, Samuel Marks et al.ICML 2026 · 32 citations
- I Have Covered All the Bases Here: Interpreting Reasoning Features in Large Language Models via Sparse AutoencodersAndrey V. Galichin, Alexey Dontsov, Polina Druzhinina, Anton Razzhigaev et al.AAAI 2026 · 31 citations
Builds on5
- Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language ModelsRobert Huben, Hoagy Cunningham, Logan Riggs Smith, Aidan Ewart et al.ICLR 2024 · 1,072 citations
- The Linear Representation Hypothesis and the Geometry of Large Language ModelsKiho Park, Yo Joong Choe, Victor VeitchICML 2024 · 461 citations
- Patchscopes: A Unifying Framework for Inspecting Hidden Representations of Language ModelsAsma Ghandeharioun, Avi Caciularu, Adam Pearce, Lucas Dixon et al.ICML 2024 · 197 citations
- A Multimodal Automated Interpretability AgentTamar Rott Shaham, Sarah Schwettmann, Franklin Wang, Achyuta Rajaram et al.ICML 2024 · 57 citations
- Scaling and evaluating sparse autoencodersLeo Gao, Tom Dupré la Tour, Henk Tillman, Gabriel Goh et al.ICLR 2025 · 10 citations
Related papers
- Evaluating SAE interpretability without generating explanationsGonçalo Paulo, Nora BelroseICLR 2026 · 2 citations
- DLM-Scope: Mechanistic Interpretability of Diffusion Language Models via Sparse AutoencodersXu Wang, Bingqing Jiang, Yu Wan, Baosong Yang et al.ICML 2026
- Route Sparse Autoencoder to Interpret Large Language ModelsWei Shi, Sihang Li, Tao Liang, Mingyang Wan et al.EMNLP 2025 · 1 citation
- Interpretable and Steerable Concept Bottleneck Sparse AutoencodersAkshay Kulkarni, Tsui-Wei Weng, Vivek Narayanaswamy, Shusen Liu et al.CVPR 2026 · 6 citations
- Sparse Autoencoders Do Not Find Canonical Units of AnalysisPatrick Leask, Bart Bussmann, Michael T. Pearce, Joseph Isaac Bloom et al.ICLR 2025
