MERA: A Comprehensive LLM Evaluation in Russian
Alena Fenogenova, Artem Chervyakov, Nikita Martynov, Anastasia Kozlova, Maria Tikhonova, Albina Akhmetgareeva, Anton A. Emelyanov, Denis Shevelev, Pavel Lebedev, Leonid Sinev, Ulyana Isaeva, Katerina Kolomeytseva
Abstract
Over the past few years, one of the most notable advancements in AI research has been in foundation models (FMs), headlined by the rise of language models (LMs). However, despite researchers' attention and the rapid growth in LM application, the capabilities, limitations, and associated risks still need to be better understood. To address these issues, we introduce a new instruction benchmark, MERA, oriented towards the FMs' performance on the Russian language. The benchmark encompasses 21 evaluation tasks for generative models covering 10 skills and is supplied with private answer scoring to prevent data leakage. The paper introduces a methodology to evaluate FMs and LMs in fixed zero-and few-shot instruction settings that can be extended to other modalities. We propose an evaluation methodology, an open-source code base for the MERA assessment, and a leaderboard with a submission system. We evaluate open LMs as baselines and find they are still far behind the human level. We publicly release MERA to guide forthcoming research, anticipate groundbreaking model features, standardize the evaluation procedure, and address potential ethical concerns and drawbacks.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 2192787f-be9a-48d6-829f-7453af669346Cited by top-tier papers3
- Evaluating LLMs for Portuguese Sentence Simplification with Linguistic InsightsArthur Mariano Rocha De Azevedo Scalercio, Elvis A. de Souza, Maria José Bocorny Finatto, Aline PaesACL 2025 · 2 citations
- TASE: Token Awareness and Structured Evaluation for Multilingual Language ModelsChenzhuo Zhao, Xinda Wang, Yue Huang, Junting Lu et al.AAAI 2026 · 1 citation
- BelarusianGLUE: Towards a Natural Language Understanding Benchmark for BelarusianMaksim Aparovich, Volha Harytskaya, Vladislav Poritski, Oksana Volchek et al.ACL 2025
Builds on15
- Is Your Code Generated by ChatGPT Really Correct? Rigorous Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code GenerationJiawei Liu, Chunqiu Steven Xia, Yuyao Wang, Lingming ZhangNeurIPS 2023 · 2,317 citations
- SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-world Github Issues?Carlos E. Jimenez, John Yang, Alexander Wettig, Shunyu Yao et al.ICLR 2024 · 2,082 citations
- Fantastically Ordered Prompts and Where to Find Them: Overcoming Few-Shot Prompt Order SensitivityYao Lu, Max Bartolo, Alastair Moore, Sebastian Riedel et al.ACL 2022 · 1,494 citations
- AutoPrompt: Eliciting Knowledge from Language Models with Automatically Generated PromptsTaylor Shin, Yasaman Razeghi, Robert L. Logan IV, Eric Wallace et al.EMNLP 2020 · 1,162 citations
- GAIA: a benchmark for General AI AssistantsGrégoire Mialon, Clémentine Fourrier, Thomas Wolf, Yann LeCun et al.ICLR 2024 · 716 citations
Related papers
- RussianSuperGLUE: A Russian Language Understanding Evaluation BenchmarkTatiana Shavrina, Alena Fenogenova, Anton A. Emelyanov, Denis Shevelev et al.EMNLP 2020 · 11 citations
- MEGA: Multilingual Evaluation of Generative AIKabir Ahuja, Harshita Diddee, Rishav Hada, Millicent Ochieng et al.EMNLP 2023 · 91 citations
- SafetyBench: Evaluating the Safety of Large Language ModelsZhexin Zhang, Leqi Lei, Lindong Wu, Rui Sun et al.ACL 2024
- Evaluating Large Language Models at Evaluating Instruction FollowingZhiyuan Zeng, Jiatong Yu, Tianyu Gao, Yu Meng et al.ICLR 2024 · 299 citations
- McEval: Massively Multilingual Code EvaluationLinzheng Chai, Shukai Liu, Jian Yang, Yuwei Yin et al.ICLR 2025 · 1 citation
