PLRV-O: Advancing Differentially Private Deep Learning via Privacy Loss Random Variable Optimization
Qin Yang, Nicholas Stout, Meisam Mohammady, Han Wang, Ayesha Samreen, Christopher J. Quinn, Yan Yan, Ashish Kundu, Yuan Hong
Abstract
Differentially Private Stochastic Gradient Descent (DP-SGD) is a standard method for enforcing privacy in deep learning, typically using the Gaussian mechanism to perturb gradient updates. However, conventional mechanisms such as Gaussian and Laplacian noise are parameterized only by variance or scale. This single degree of freedom ties the magnitude of noise directly to both privacy loss and utility degradation, preventing independent control of these two factors. The problem becomes more pronounced when the number of composition rounds T and batch size B vary across tasks, as these variations induce task-dependent shifts in the privacy–utility trade-off, where small changes in noise parameters can disproportionately affect model accuracy. To address this limitation, we introduce PLRV-O, a framework that defines a broad search space of parameterized DP-SGD noise distributions, where privacy loss moments are tightly characterized yet can be optimized more independently with respect to utility loss. This formulation enables systematic adaptation of noise to task-specific requirements, including (i) model size, (ii) training duration, (iii) batch sampling strategies, and (iv) clipping thresholds under both training and fine-tuning settings. Empirical results demonstrate that PLRV-O substantially improves utility under strict privacy constraints. On CIFAR-10, a fine-tuned ViT achieves 94.03% accuracy at ∈ ≈ 0.5, compared to 83.93% with Gaussian noise. On SST-2, RoBERTa-large reaches 92.20% accuracy at ∈ ≈ 0.2, versus 50.25% with Gaussian. Source code is available at https://github.com/datasec-lab/plrvo.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 20c56308-ac04-451b-aaa1-09977e29dbd5Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on23
- Deep Learning with Differential PrivacyMartín Abadi, Andy Chu, Ian J. Goodfellow, H. Brendan McMahan et al.CCS 2016 · 7,620 citations
- Membership Inference Attacks Against Machine Learning ModelsReza Shokri, Marco Stronati, Congzheng Song, Vitaly ShmatikovS&P 2017 · 5,137 citations
- Inverting Gradients - How easy is it to break privacy in federated learning?Jonas Geiping, Hartmut Bauermeister, Hannah Dröge, Michael MoellerNeurIPS 2020 · 1,822 citations
- The Secret Sharer: Evaluating and Testing Unintended Memorization in Neural NetworksNicholas Carlini, Chang Liu, Úlfar Erlingsson, Jernej Kos et al.USENIX Security 2019 · 1,386 citations
- Laplace Redux - Effortless Bayesian Deep LearningErik A. Daxberger, Agustinus Kristiadi, Alexander Immer, Runa Eschenhagen et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 508 citations
Related papers
- Have it your way: Individualized Privacy Assignment for DP-SGDFranziska Boenisch, Christopher Mühl, Adam Dziedzic, Roy Rinberg et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 39 citations
- DPIS: An Enhanced Mechanism for Differentially Private SGD with Importance SamplingJianxin Wei, Ergute Bao, Xiaokui Xiao, Yin YangCCS 2022 · 16 citations
- TAN Without a Burn: Scaling Laws of DP-SGDTom Sander, Pierre Stock, Alexandre SablayrollesICML 2023 · 58 citations
- Eliminating Solution Bias in Differentially Private OptimizationDONGRUN LI, YUN ZENG, Zibo Wei, Jiacheng Wei et al.ICML 2026
- Enhancing DPSGD via Per-Sample Momentum and Low-Pass FilteringXincheng Xu, Thilina Ranbaduge, Qing Wang, Thierry Rakotoarivelo et al.AAAI 2026
