What's Left Unsaid? Detecting and Correcting Misleading Omissions in Multimodal News Previews

Even when factually correct, social-media news previews (image-headline pairs) can induce interpretation drift: by selectively omitting crucial context, they lead readers to form judgments that diverge from what the full article supports. This covert harm is subtler than explicit misinformation, yet remains underexplored. To address this gap, we develop a multistage pipeline that simulates preview-based and context-based understanding, enabling construction of the MM-MISLEADING benchmark. Using MM-MISLEADING, we systematically evaluate open-source LVLMs and uncover pronounced blind spots in omission-based misleadingness detection. We further propose OM-GUARD, which combines (1) Interpretation-Aware Fine-Tuning for misleadingness detection and (2) Rationale-Guided Misleading Content Correction, where explicit rationales guide headline rewriting to reduce misleading impressions. Experiments show that OM-GUARD lifts an 8B model's detection accuracy to the level of a 235B LVLM while delivering markedly stronger end-to-end correction. Further analysis shows that misleadingness usually arises from local narrative shifts, such as missing background, instead of global frame changes, and identifies image-driven cases where text-only correction fails, underscoring the need for visual interventions. 1 * Corresponding Author 1 Data and code are available at https://github.com/ fanxiao15/OMGuard .