DUET: Optimizing LLM Training Data Mixtures via Noisy Feedback from Unseen, Downstream Evaluation Tasks
Zhiliang Chen, Gregory Kang Ruey Lau, Chuan Sheng Foo, Bryan Kian Hsiang Low
Abstract
The performance of an LLM depends heavily on how well the training data matches the downstream evaluation task. However, in many practical settings, we typically do not know the data in the evaluation task (e.g., conversations between a chatbot and users are end-to-end encrypted). We refer to such tasks as unseen evaluation tasks. We can only deploy the LLM on these unseen evaluation tasks to gather multiple rounds of feedback on how well the model performs (e.g., gathering user ratings from a chatbot). In addition, this feedback can be noisy. How can we exploit such noisy feedback efficiently to optimize the LLM training data-mixture? Our paper presents DUET, a novel global-to-local algorithm that optimizes training data mixtures by interleaving data selection with Bayesian optimization to exploit coarse and noisy feedback from a downstream evaluation task. DUET is flexible enough to incorporate different data selection methods, each with different performance-compute tradeoffs. By analyzing DUET's cumulative regret, we theoretically show that DUET converges to the optimal training data mixture even without any fine-grained data information from an unseen task. Finally, our experiments across a variety of language tasks demonstrate that DUET attains substantial performance improvements over existing data selection and mixing methods in the unseen-task setting. Our library, which is flexible enough to optimize different LLM training ingredients, can be found at https://github.com/chenzhiliang94/BO-for-LLM.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on16
- Estimating Training Data Influence by Tracing Gradient DescentGarima Pruthi, Frederick Liu, Satyen Kale, Mukund SundararajanNeurIPS 2020 · 784 citations
- An empirical analysis of compute-optimal large language model trainingJordan Hoffmann, Sebastian Borgeaud, Arthur Mensch, Elena Buchatskaya et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 566 citations
- Coresets for Data-efficient Training of Machine Learning ModelsBaharan Mirzasoleiman, Jeff A. Bilmes, Jure LeskovecICML 2020 · 494 citations
- LESS: Selecting Influential Data for Targeted Instruction TuningMengzhou Xia, Sadhika Malladi, Suchin Gururangan, Sanjeev Arora et al.ICML 2024 · 460 citations
- DoReMi: Optimizing Data Mixtures Speeds Up Language Model PretrainingSang Michael Xie, Hieu Pham, Xuanyi Dong, Nan Du et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 457 citations
Related papers
- Data Mixture Optimization: A Multi-fidelity Multi-scale Bayesian FrameworkThomson Yen, Andrew Siah, Haozhe Chen, C. Guetta et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 12 citations
- HBO: Hierarchical Balancing Optimization for Fine-Tuning Large Language ModelsWeixuan Wang, Minghao Wu, Barry Haddow, Alexandra BirchICLR 2026 · 2 citations
- Scaling Multi-Task Bayesian Optimization with Large Language ModelsYimeng Zeng, Natalie Maus, Haydn Thomas Jones, Jeffrey Tao et al.ICLR 2026 · 1 citation
- LILO: Bayesian Optimization with Natural Language FeedbackKatarzyna Kobalczyk, Zhiyuan Lin, Benjamin Letham, Zhuokai Zhao et al.ICML 2026 · 2 citations
- Language Models as Black-Box Optimizers for Vision-Language ModelsShihong Liu, Samuel Yu, Zhiqiu Lin, Deepak Pathak et al.CVPR 2024 · 18 citations
