Compressed -Protocol Theory and Practical Application to Plug & Play Secure Algorithmics
Thomas Attema, Ronald Cramer
Abstract
Σ-Protocols provide a well-understood basis for secure algorithmics. Recently, Bulletproofs (Bootle et al., EUROCRYPT 2016, and Bünz et al., S&P 2018) have been proposed as a drop-in replacement in case of zero-knowledge (ZK) for arithmetic circuits, achieving logarithmic communication instead of linear. Its pivot is an ingenious, logarithmic-size proof of knowledge BP for certain quadratic relations. However, reducing ZK for general relations to it forces a somewhat cumbersome "reinvention" of cryptographic protocol theory. We take a rather different viewpoint and reconcile Bulletproofs with Σ-Protocol Theory such that (a) simpler circuit ZK is developed within established theory, while (b) achieving exactly the same logarithmic communication.
The natural key here is linearization. First, we repurpose BPs as a blackbox compression mechanism for standard Σ-Protocols handling ZK proofs of general linear relations (on compactly committed secret vectors); our pivot. Second, we reduce the case of general nonlinear relations to blackbox applications of our pivot via a novel variation on arithmetic secret sharing based techniques for Σ-Protocols (Cramer et al., ICITS 2012). Orthogonally, we enhance versatility by enabling scenarios not previously addressed, e.g., when a secret input is dispersed across several commitments. Standard implementation platforms leading to logarithmic communication follow from a Discrete-Log assumption or a generalized Strong-RSA assumption. Also, under a Knowledge-of-Exponent Assumption (KEA) communication drops to constant, as in ZK-SNARKS. All in all, our theory should more generally be useful for modular ("plug & play") design of practical cryptographic protocols; this is further evidenced by our separate work (2020) on proofs of partial knowledge.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers2
- Threshold Signatures with Private AccountabilityDan Boneh, Chelsea KomloCRYPTO 2022 · 48 citations
- Pairing-Free Blind Signatures from Standard Assumptions in the ROMJulia Kastner, Ky Nguyen, Michael ReichleCRYPTO 2024 · 11 citations
Builds on6
- Bulletproofs: Short Proofs for Confidential Transactions and MoreBenedikt Bünz, Jonathan Bootle, Dan Boneh, Andrew Poelstra et al.S&P 2018 · 1,285 citations
- Sonic: Zero-Knowledge SNARKs from Linear-Size Universal and Updatable Structured Reference StringsMary Maller, Sean Bowe, Markulf Kohlweiss, Sarah MeiklejohnCCS 2019 · 412 citations
- Transparent SNARKs from DARK CompilersBenedikt Bünz, Ben Fisch, Alan SzepieniecEUROCRYPT 2020 · 240 citations
- A Non-PCP Approach to Succinct Quantum-Safe Zero-KnowledgeJonathan Bootle, Vadim Lyubashevsky, Ngoc Khanh Nguyen, Gregor SeilerCRYPTO 2020 · 51 citations
- Efficient Zero-Knowledge Arguments in the Discrete Log Setting, RevisitedMax Hoffmann, Michael Klooß, Andy RuppCCS 2019 · 47 citations
Related papers
- A Compressed -Protocol Theory for LatticesThomas Attema, Ronald Cramer, Lisa KohlCRYPTO 2021 · 74 citations
- Compressing Proofs of k-Out-Of-n Partial KnowledgeThomas Attema, Ronald Cramer, Serge FehrCRYPTO 2021 · 42 citations
- Bulletproofs++: Next Generation Confidential Transactions via Reciprocal Set Membership ArgumentsLiam Eagen, Sanket Kanjalkar, Tim Ruffing, Jonas NickEUROCRYPT 2024 · 14 citations
- Succinct Arguments for Bilinear Group Arithmetic: Practical Structure-Preserving CryptographyRussell W. F. Lai, Giulio Malavolta, Viktoria RongeCCS 2019 · 50 citations
- Leaking Arbitrarily Many Secrets: Any-out-of-Many Proofs and Applications to RingCT ProtocolsTianyu Zheng, Shang Gao, Yubo Song, Bin XiaoS&P 2023
