Verified Lock-Free Session Channels with Linking
Thomas Somers, Robbert Krebbers
Abstract
Type systems and program logics based on session types provide powerful high-level reasoning principles for message-passing concurrency. Modern versions employ bidirectional session channels that (1) are asynchronous so that send operations do not block, (2) have buffers in both directions so that both parties can send messages in parallel, and (3) feature a link operation (also called forward ) to concisely write programs in process style . These features complicate a low-level lock-free implementation of channels and therefore increase the gap between the meta theory of prior work—which is verified w.r.t. a high-level semantics of channels ( e.g ., π -calculus)—and the code that runs on an actual computer. We address this problem by verifying a low-level lock-free implementation of session channels w.r.t. a high-level specification based on session types. We carry out our verification in a layered manner by employing the Iris framework for concurrent separation logic. We start with an abstract specification of (unidirectional) queues—of which we provide a linked-list and array-segment based implementation—and gradually build up to session channels with all of the aforementioned features. To make a layered verification possible we develop two logical abstractions— queues with ghost linking and pairing invariants —to reason about the atomicity and changing endpoints due to linking, respectively. All our results are mechanized in the Coq proof assistant.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 1f5d5407-8d79-422a-8468-cebcf56014b6Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on5
- Actris: session-type based reasoning in separation logicJonas Kastberg Hinrichsen, Jesper Bengtson, Robbert KrebbersPOPL 2020 · 44 citations
- Compass: strong and compositional library specifications in relaxed memory separation logicHoang-Hai Dang, Jaehwang Jung, Jaemin Choi, Duc-Than Nguyen et al.PLDI 2022 · 19 citations
- Deadlock-Free Separation Logic: Linearity Yields Progress for Dependent Higher-Order Message PassingJules Jacobs, Jonas Kastberg Hinrichsen, Robbert KrebbersPOPL 2024 · 12 citations
- Multris: Functional Verification of Multiparty Message Passing in Separation LogicJonas Kastberg Hinrichsen, Jules Jacobs, Robbert KrebbersOOPSLA 2024 · 6 citations
- A Proof Recipe for Linearizability in Relaxed Memory Separation LogicSunho Park, Jaewoo Kim, Ike Mulder, Jaehwang Jung et al.PLDI 2024 · 4 citations
Related papers
- Mixtris: Mechanised Higher-Order Separation Logic for Mixed Choice Multiparty Message PassingJonas Kastberg Hinrichsen, Iwan Quémerais, Lars BirkedalOOPSLA 2026
- Beyond Backtracking: Connections in Fine-Grained Concurrent Separation LogicIke Mulder, Lukasz Czajka, Robbert KrebbersPLDI 2023 · 2 citations
- Fair termination of binary sessionsLuca Ciccone, Luca PadovaniPOPL 2022 · 8 citations
- A separation logic for effect handlersPaulo Emílio de Vilhena, François PottierPOPL 2021 · 24 citations
- Mechanizing Session-Types using a Structural View: Enforcing Linearity without LinearityChuta Sano, Ryan Kavanagh, Brigitte PientkaOOPSLA 2023 · 10 citations
