DeepfakeImpact: A Two-Stage Benchmark with Real-World Impact in Deepfake Detection
Chaoyu Gong, Han Zhang, Siqiang Luo
Abstract
A fundamental yet overlooked limitation of current deepfake detection benchmark is the lack of evaluation frameworks that align technical accuracy with real-world impact. We argue that technical metrics may fail to capture models' actual capacity to mitigate real-world harm, as they treat all errors as equally significant. To bridge this gap, we introduce DeepfakeImpact, a two-stage benchmark that moves beyond pure technical evaluation toward societally-aware assessment. In Stage I, we establish standardized technical baselines by evaluating 33 SOTA detection baslines across 12 widely used datasets. In Stage II, we propose a novel metric (Social Misjudgment Impact, SMI) that quantifies the potential social harm of misclassified videos, and construct an SMI-critical dataset containing high-risk samples. By integrating SMI-aware performance metrics, we shift the evaluation focus from "how accurate" to "how socially beneficial" a detector is. DeepfakeImpact thus provides a more realistic and ethically-grounded foundation for assessing deepfake detectors, urging the community to rethink what truly constitutes progress in this field. All resources will be publicly released at: https://github. com/explorerZH/DeepfakeImpact-Stage1.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 1f571525-60fa-40e6-8f80-8d98b5152b97Builds on29
- Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic ModelsJonathan Ho, Ajay Jain, Pieter AbbeelNeurIPS 2020 · 35,902 citations
- FaceForensics++: Learning to Detect Manipulated Facial ImagesAndreas Rössler, Davide Cozzolino, Luisa Verdoliva, Christian Riess et al.ICCV 2019 · 2,966 citations
- Video Diffusion ModelsJonathan Ho, Tim Salimans, Alexey A. Gritsenko, William Chan et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 2,948 citations
- Is Space-Time Attention All You Need for Video Understanding?Gedas Bertasius, Heng Wang, Lorenzo TorresaniICML 2021 · 2,927 citations
- WildDeepfake: A Challenging Real-World Dataset for Deepfake DetectionBojia Zi, Minghao Chang, Jingjing Chen, Xingjun Ma et al.ACM MM 2020 · 443 citations
Related papers
- SoK: The Good, The Bad, and The Unbalanced: Measuring Structural Limitations of Deepfake Media DatasetsSeth Layton, Tyler Tucker, Daniel Olszewski, Kevin Warren et al.USENIX Security 2024 · 11 citations
- VoiceWukong: Benchmarking Deepfake Voice DetectionZiwei Yan, Yanjie Zhao, Haoyu WangUSENIX Security 2025
- SIDA: Social Media Image Deepfake Detection, Localization and Explanation with Large Multimodal ModelZhenglin Huang, Jinwei Hu, Xiangtai Li, Yiwei He et al.CVPR 2025
- AV-Deepfake1M: A Large-Scale LLM-Driven Audio-Visual Deepfake DatasetZhixi Cai, Shreya Ghosh, Aman Pankaj Adatia, Munawar Hayat et al.ACM MM 2024 · 51 citations
- Proactive Defense Benchmark against Deepfake GenerationJoonhyuk Baek, Wonjune Seo, Jae-yun Kim, Saerom Park et al.ICML 2026
