An Open-Ended Benchmark and Formal Framework for Adjuvant Research with MLLM
yi chen, Yu Zhang, Jian Xu, Hua Yue, Xinming Wang, Zequan Lyu, Xu-Yao Zhang, Wei Wei, Cheng-Lin Liu
Abstract
Adjuvants play a critical role in modulating immune responses and are central to the development of vaccines and immunotherapies. Yet progress in this field is constrained by data scarcity and incomplete understanding of mechanisms of action, which limit the transition from experience-based design to AI-driven approaches. To address these challenges, we present the first benchmark dedicated to adjuvants, constructed in an open-ended Q&A format and annotated by domain experts. The benchmark comprises 1,294 Q&A pairs and 1,364 formal descriptions, providing a resource for evaluating general-purpose multimodal large language models (MLLMs) and for developing domain-specific systems.
We systematically assess 11 closed-source and 18 open-source MLLMs across dimensions including domain-specific Q&A, hallucination rejection, data generation, and instruction following. Results indicate that OpenAI-o1 (STS = 0.7495, LLM Score = 7.7) and DeepSeek-R1 (STS = 0.7415, LLM Score = 7.7) achieved the strongest performance among closed- and open-source models, respectively. In addition, we introduce a formal description framework for representing adjuvant design principles and immune mechanisms as structured abstractions, which can serve as building blocks for future domain-specialized MLLMs. Overall, this work provides a first step toward systematically integrating MLLMs into adjuvant research by offering a dedicated benchmark, comparative evaluation of existing models, and a formal foundation for future development. Data and code will be released at https://github.com/banjiuyufen/Adjuvant-Benchmark.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on10
- Visual Instruction TuningHaotian Liu, Chunyuan Li, Qingyang Wu, Yong Jae LeeNeurIPS 2023 · 11,349 citations
- InstructBLIP: Towards General-purpose Vision-Language Models with Instruction TuningWenliang Dai, Junnan Li, Dongxu Li, Anthony Meng Huat Tiong et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 4,013 citations
- LLM Evaluators Recognize and Favor Their Own GenerationsArjun Panickssery, Samuel R. Bowman, Shi FengNeurIPS 2024 · 865 citations
- Prometheus: Inducing Fine-Grained Evaluation Capability in Language ModelsSeungone Kim, Jamin Shin, Yejin Choi, Joel Jang et al.ICLR 2024 · 468 citations
- Intern VL: Scaling up Vision Foundation Models and Aligning for Generic Visual-Linguistic TasksZhe Chen, Jiannan Wu, Wenhai Wang, Weijie Su et al.CVPR 2024
Related papers
- AdsQA: Towards Advertisement Video UnderstandingXinwei Long, Kai Tian, Peng Xu, Guoli Jia et al.ICCV 2025 · 1 citation
- Do MLLMs Capture How Interfaces Guide User Behavior? A Benchmark for Multimodal UI/UX Design UnderstandingJaehyun Jeon, Min Soo Kim, Janghan Yoon, Sumin Shim et al.ACL 2026 · 1 citation
- MultiBreak: A Scalable and Diverse Multi-turn Jailbreak Benchmark for Evaluating LLM SafetyJialin Song, Xiaodong Liu, Weiwei Yang, Wuyang Chen et al.ICML 2026 · 5 citations
- ScienceAgentBench: Toward Rigorous Assessment of Language Agents for Data-Driven Scientific DiscoveryZiru Chen, Shijie Chen, Yuting Ning, Qianheng Zhang et al.ICLR 2025 · 6 citations
- USB: A Comprehensive and Unified Safety Evaluation Benchmark for Multimodal Large Language ModelsBaolin Zheng, Guanlin Chen, Qingyang Teng, Hongqiong Zhong et al.ACL 2026 · 10 citations
