Simplifying Model-based RL: Learning Representations, Latent-space Models, and Policies with One Objective
Raj Ghugare, Homanga Bharadhwaj, Benjamin Eysenbach, Sergey Levine, Russ Salakhutdinov
Abstract
While reinforcement learning (RL) methods that learn an internal model of the environment have the potential to be more sample efficient than their model-free counterparts, learning to model raw observations from high dimensional sensors can be challenging. Prior work has addressed this challenge by learning lowdimensional representation of observations through auxiliary objectives, such as reconstruction or value prediction. However, the alignment between these auxiliary objectives and the RL objective is often unclear. In this work, we propose a single objective which jointly optimizes a latent-space model and policy to achieve high returns while remaining self-consistent. This objective is a lower bound on expected returns. Unlike prior bounds for model-based RL on policy exploration or model guarantees, our bound is directly on the overall RL objective. We demonstrate that the resulting algorithm matches or improves the sample-efficiency of the best prior model-based and model-free RL methods. While sample efficient methods typically are computationally demanding, our method attains the performance of SAC in about 50% less wall-clock time 1 .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 1f1079ab-7d17-477e-bac0-dfad77d766c6Cited by top-tier papers13
- Simple Hierarchical Planning with DiffusionChang Chen, Fei Deng, Kenji Kawaguchi, Caglar Gulcehre et al.ICLR 2024 · 79 citations
- Bridging State and History Representations: Understanding Self-Predictive RLTianwei Ni, Benjamin Eysenbach, Erfan Seyedsalehi, Michel Ma et al.ICLR 2024 · 50 citations
- Simplified Temporal Consistency Reinforcement LearningYi Zhao, Wenshuai Zhao, Rinu Boney, Juho Kannala et al.ICML 2023 · 19 citations
- How to Fine-tune the Model: Unified Model Shift and Model Bias Policy OptimizationHai Zhang, Hang Yu, Junqiao Zhao, Di Zhang et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 16 citations
- Do Transformer World Models Give Better Policy Gradients?Michel Ma, Tianwei Ni, Clement Gehring, Pierluca D'Oro et al.ICML 2024 · 7 citations
Builds on30
- Bootstrap Your Own Latent - A New Approach to Self-Supervised LearningJean-Bastien Grill, Florian Strub, Florent Altché, Corentin Tallec et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 9,171 citations
- Dream to Control: Learning Behaviors by Latent ImaginationDanijar Hafner, Timothy P. Lillicrap, Jimmy Ba, Mohammad NorouziICLR 2020 · 1,852 citations
- Mastering Atari with Discrete World ModelsDanijar Hafner, Timothy P. Lillicrap, Mohammad Norouzi, Jimmy BaICLR 2021 · 1,170 citations
- Model Based Reinforcement Learning for AtariLukasz Kaiser, Mohammad Babaeizadeh, Piotr Milos, Blazej Osinski et al.ICLR 2020 · 969 citations
- Mastering Visual Continuous Control: Improved Data-Augmented Reinforcement LearningDenis Yarats, Rob Fergus, Alessandro Lazaric, Lerrel PintoICLR 2022 · 457 citations
Related papers
- Stochastic Latent Actor-Critic: Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Latent Variable ModelAlex X. Lee, Anusha Nagabandi, Pieter Abbeel, Sergey LevineNeurIPS 2020 · 437 citations
- Improving Sample Efficiency in Model-Free Reinforcement Learning from ImagesDenis Yarats, Amy Zhang, Ilya Kostrikov, Brandon Amos et al.AAAI 2021 · 506 citations
- Mask-based Latent Reconstruction for Reinforcement LearningTao Yu, Zhizheng Zhang, Cuiling Lan, Yan Lu et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 80 citations
- Dynamics-Aware EmbeddingsWilliam F. Whitney, Rajat Agarwal, Kyunghyun Cho, Abhinav GuptaICLR 2020
- Rich-Observation Reinforcement Learning with Continuous Latent DynamicsYuda Song, Lili Wu, Dylan J. Foster, Akshay KrishnamurthyICML 2024 · 2 citations
