LLM Circuit Analyses Are Consistent Across Training and Scale
Curt Tigges, Michael Hanna, Qinan Yu, Stella Biderman
Abstract
Most currently deployed large language models (LLMs) undergo continuous training or additional finetuning. By contrast, most research into LLMs’ internal mechanisms focuses on models at one snapshot in time (the end of pre-training), raising the question of whether their results generalize to real-world settings. Existing studies of mechanisms over time focus on encoder-only or toy models, which differ significantly from most deployed models. In this study, we track how model mechanisms, operationalized as circuits, emerge and evolve across 300 billion tokens of training in decoder-only LLMs, in models ranging from 70 million to 2.8 billion parameters. We find that task abilities and the functional components that support them emerge consistently at similar token counts across scale. Moreover, although such components may be implemented by different attention heads over time, the overarching algorithm that they implement remains. Surprisingly, both these algorithms and the types of components involved therein tend to replicate across model scale. Finally, we find that circuit size correlates with model size and can fluctuate considerably over time even when the same algorithm is implemented. These results suggest that circuit analyses conducted on small models at the end of pre-training can provide insights that still apply after additional training and over model scale.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 1efbf6c8-fef6-434d-b0d9-dcba35f7d669Cited by top-tier papers21
- A Implies B: Circuit Analysis in LLMs for Propositional Logical ReasoningGuanzhe Hong, Nishanth Dikkala, Enming Luo, Cyrus Rashtchian et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 17 citations
- Structural Inference: Interpreting Small Language Models with SusceptibilitiesGarrett Baker, George Wang, Jesse Hoogland, Vinayak Pathak et al.ICLR 2026 · 11 citations
- Mechanistic Data Attribution: Tracing the Training Origins of Interpretable LLM UnitsJianhui Chen, Yuzhang Luo, Liangming PanICML 2026 · 6 citations
- Bigram Subnetworks: Mapping to Next Tokens in Transformer Language ModelsTyler A. Chang, Benjamin BergenNeurIPS 2025 · 5 citations
- Influence Dynamics and Stagewise Data AttributionJin Hwa Lee, Matthew Smith, Maxwell Adam, Jesse HooglandICLR 2026 · 5 citations
Builds on26
- LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language ModelsEdward J. Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu et al.ICLR 2022 · 18,833 citations
- Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPTKevin Meng, David Bau, Alex Andonian, Yonatan BelinkovNeurIPS 2022 · 3,415 citations
- WinoGrande: An Adversarial Winograd Schema Challenge at ScaleKeisuke Sakaguchi, Ronan Le Bras, Chandra Bhagavatula, Yejin ChoiAAAI 2020 · 3,037 citations
- Pythia: A Suite for Analyzing Large Language Models Across Training and ScalingStella Biderman, Hailey Schoelkopf, Quentin Gregory Anthony, Herbie Bradley et al.ICML 2023 · 1,822 citations
- Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language ModelsRobert Huben, Hoagy Cunningham, Logan Riggs Smith, Aidan Ewart et al.ICLR 2024 · 1,072 citations
Related papers
- The Same but Different: Structural Similarities and Differences in Multilingual Language ModelingRuochen Zhang, Qinan Yu, Matianyu Zang, Carsten Eickhoff et al.ICLR 2025
- Towards Understanding Fine-Tuning Mechanisms of LLMs via Circuit AnalysisXu Wang, Yan Hu, Wenyu Du, Reynold Cheng et al.ICML 2025
- Towards Interpretable Sequence Continuation: Analyzing Shared Circuits in Large Language ModelsMichael Lan, Philip Torr, Fazl BarezEMNLP 2024 · 1 citation
- Successor Heads: Recurring, Interpretable Attention Heads In The WildRhys Gould, Euan Ong, George Ogden, Arthur ConmyICLR 2024 · 75 citations
- Evaluating the Impact of Model Scale for Compositional Generalization in Semantic ParsingLinlu Qiu, Peter Shaw, Panupong Pasupat, Tianze Shi et al.EMNLP 2022 · 21 citations
