USENIX Security2026Top-tier venue
Differential Trust: Dynamic Multi-Authority Anonymous Credentials with Epoch-Weighted Updates
Chen Li, Jianting Ning, Xiulong Liu, Yulin Liu
Abstract
Anonymous credentials (ACs) are fundamental to privacy-preserving authentication, allowing users to prove possession of attributes without revealing their identities. State-of-the-art ACs distribute credential issuance across multiple authorities, typically employing techniques such as Shamir's secret sharing or aggregate signatures. While this approach enhances system robustness and eliminates single point of failure, it treats all authorities equally in the credential issuance phase. This uniform treatment disregards the varying levels of trustworthiness or stake held by different authorities. Such limitation has become particularly problematic in modern decentralized systems like Proof-of-Stake networks, where the inherent trust differentiation among nodes cannot be leveraged in the credential issuance process. To address this limitation, we propose the notion of M ulti- A uthority A nonymous C redentials with E poch-Based W eights (MA-ACEW), the first Multi-Authority Anonymous Credential (MA-AC) model that considers authorities' weight distribution in credential issuance. Crucially, MA-ACEW enables efficient credential updates when authority weight distributions change across epochs. The core of MA-ACEW is our novel Epoch-Bound Pointcheval-Sanders Signature (EB-PS) primitive, which binds signatures to specific time epochs. This temporal binding enables both weight-based credential issuance within epochs and efficient non-interactive credential updates across epochs. We formalize the EUF-eCMA unforgeability requirement for EB-PS and prove our construction satisfies it under a novel STB-GPS assumption. We then prove that our MA-ACEW construction achieves unforgeability, anonymity, and blindness. Finally, we present benchmarks demonstrating the efficiency of EB-PS and MA-ACEW. Remarkably, presenting a credential aggregated from 128 partial ones takes only 10.68 ms on average.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 1ed5b6fe-dc34-4c10-adc1-092f6a75e4c2Builds on11
- Coconut: Threshold Issuance Selective Disclosure Credentials with Applications to Distributed LedgersAlberto Sonnino, Mustafa Al-Bassam, Shehar Bano, Sarah Meiklejohn et al.NDSS 2019 · 218 citations
- FlyClient: Super-Light Clients for CryptocurrenciesBenedikt Bünz, Lucianna Kiffer, Loi Luu, Mahdi ZamaniS&P 2020 · 151 citations
- Updatable Anonymous Credentials and Applications to Incentive SystemsJohannes Blömer, Jan Bobolz, Denis Diemert, Fabian EidensCCS 2019 · 52 citations
- With a Little Help from My Friends: Constructing Practical Anonymous CredentialsLucjan Hanzlik, Daniel SlamanigCCS 2021 · 52 citations
- Anonymous Tokens with Private Metadata BitBen Kreuter, Tancrède Lepoint, Michele Orrù, Mariana RaykovaCRYPTO 2020 · 35 citations
Related papers
- Aggregate Signatures with Versatile Randomization and Issuer-Hiding Multi-Authority Anonymous CredentialsOmid Mir, Balthazar Bauer, Scott Griffy, Anna Lysyanskaya et al.CCS 2023 · 29 citations
- Server-Aided Anonymous CredentialsRutchathon Chairattana-Apirom, Franklin Harding, Anna Lysyanskaya, Stefano TessaroCRYPTO 2025 · 10 citations
- Do You Need a Receipt? Anonymous Credential Revocation at Continental Scale via Private Record CertificationKasra EdalatNejad, Sebastian Faust, Jonas Hofmann, Philipp-Florens Lehwalder et al.USENIX Security 2026 · 1 citation
- Multi-Holder Anonymous Credentials from BBS SignaturesAndrea Flamini, Eysa Lee, Anna LysyanskayaCRYPTO 2025 · 6 citations
- Device-Bound Anonymous Credentials With(out) Trusted HardwareKarla Friedrichs, Franklin Harding, Anja Lehmann, Anna LysyanskayaEUROCRYPT 2026 · 1 citation
