ACL Findings2024
MathBench: Evaluating the Theory and Application Proficiency of LLMs with a Hierarchical Mathematics Benchmark
Hongwei Liu, Zilong Zheng, Yuxuan Qiao, Haodong Duan, Zhiwei Fei, Fengzhe Zhou, Wenwei Zhang, Songyang Zhang, Dahua Lin, Kai Chen
Abstract
Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) have showcased significant improvements in mathematics. However, traditional math benchmarks like GSM8k offer a unidimensional perspective, falling short in providing a holistic assessment of the LLMs' math capabilities. To address this gap, we introduce MathBench, a new benchmark that rigorously assesses the mathematical capabilities of large language models. MathBench spans a wide range of mathematical disciplines, offering a detailed evaluation of both theoretical understanding and practical problem-solving skills. The benchmark progresses through five distinct stages, from basic arithmetic to college mathematics, and is structured to evaluate models at various depths of knowledge. Each stage includes theoretical questions and application problems, allowing us to measure a model's mathematical proficiency and its ability to apply concepts in practical scenarios. MathBench aims to enhance the evaluation of LLMs' mathematical abilities, providing a nuanced view of their knowledge understanding levels and problem solving skills in a bilingual context. The project is released at https://github. com/open-compass/MathBench.
Ask Lune
Ask anything. The answer quotes the paper.
Lune reads all of it and the papers around it, then shows you the passages behind every answer.
Lune answers from
the full paper · 29 top-tier papers that cite it · related work
Free to start. No credit card required.
Cited by top-tier papers29
- Towards Greater Leverage: Scaling Laws for Efficient Mixture-of-Experts Language ModelsChangxin Tian, Kunlong Chen, Jia Liu, Ziqi Liu et al.ICLR 2026 · 45 citations
- WSM: Decay-Free Learning Rate Schedule via Checkpoint Merging for LLM Pre-trainingChangxin Tian, jiapeng wang, Qian Zhao, Kunlong Chen et al.ICLR 2026 · 20 citations
- Do We Truly Need So Many Samples? Multi-LLM Repeated Sampling Efficiently Scales Test-Time ComputeJianhao Chen, Zishuo Xun, Bocheng Zhou, Han Qi et al.AAAI 2026 · 18 citations
- GuidedBench: Measuring and Mitigating the Evaluation Discrepancies of In-the-wild LLM Jailbreak MethodsRuixuan Huang, Xunguang Wang, Zongjie Li, Daoyuan Wu et al.ICLR 2026 · 11 citations
- Atomic Thinking of LLMs: Decoupling and Exploring Mathematical Reasoning AbilitiesJiayi Kuang, Haojing Huang, Yinghui Li, Xinnian Liang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 11 citations
Builds on2
- Llemma: An Open Language Model for MathematicsZhangir Azerbayev, Hailey Schoelkopf, Keiran Paster, Marco Dos Santos et al.ICLR 2024 · 433 citations
- SciBench: Evaluating College-Level Scientific Problem-Solving Abilities of Large Language ModelsXiaoxuan Wang, Ziniu Hu, Pan Lu, Yanqiao Zhu et al.ICML 2024 · 220 citations
Related papers
- CS-Bench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Large Language Models towards Computer Science MasteryXiaoshuai Song, Muxi Diao, Guanting Dong, Zhengyang Wang et al.ICLR 2025
- Exposing Numeracy Gaps: A Benchmark to Evaluate Fundamental Numerical Abilities in Large Language ModelsHaoyang Li, Xuejia Chen, Zhanchao Xu, Darian Li et al.ACL Findings 2025 · 12 citations
- UGMathBench: A Diverse and Dynamic Benchmark for Undergraduate-Level Mathematical Reasoning with Large Language ModelsXin Xu, Jiaxin Zhang, Tianhao Chen, Zitong Chao et al.ICLR 2025
- WirelessMathBench: A Mathematical Modeling Benchmark for LLMs in Wireless CommunicationsXin Li, Mengbing Liu, Li Wei, Jiancheng An et al.ACL Findings 2025 · 6 citations
- Is Your Model Really A Good Math Reasoner? Evaluating Mathematical Reasoning with ChecklistZihao Zhou, Shudong Liu, Maizhen Ning, Wei Liu et al.ICLR 2025
