ReCot: Reflective Self-Correction Training for Mitigating Confirmation Bias in Large Vision-Language Models
Mengxue Qu, Yibo Hu, Kunyang Han, Yunchao Wei, Yao Zhao
Abstract
Recent advancements in Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) have greatly improved their ability to understand both visual and text information. However, a common problem in LVLMs is confirmation bias, where models tend to repeat previous assumptions and follow earlier viewpoints instead of reflecting and correcting themselves. This problem is more common in smaller-scale LVLMs, as they are usually fine-tuned with training data that is mostly positive, focusing on generating coherent dialogue. To address this issue, we introduce ReCoT, a method designed to mitigate confirmation bias in smaller-scale LVLMs through Reflective Self-Correction Training. The method follows a two-stage SFT-DPO paradigm: the first SFT stage aims to cultivate the model's reflective correction abilities, while the DPO stage focuses on enhancing the consistency between answers and reflections. Specifically, we construct dialogue-based reflective samples, which serve as adversarial samples during SFT. In this process, the model is initially presented with a potentially incorrect answer, followed by a reflection and correction phase to generate the final answer. To enhance answer-reflection consistency, we propose the consistency direct preference optimization. To comprehensively evaluate the effectiveness of our ReCoT, we introduce a set of novel metrics to measure the accuracy of the reflection and correction process. Extensive experiments show that ReCoT enables LVLM to engage in robust self-reflection and error correction and reduce confirmation bias. Code is available at ReCoT.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 1e981e59-f6ea-4f82-a96a-ca57b898ca9aBuilds on28
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language ModelsShunyu Yao, Dian Yu, Jeffrey Zhao, Izhak Shafran et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 5,068 citations
- Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-FeedbackAman Madaan, Niket Tandon, Prakhar Gupta, Skyler Hallinan et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 4,972 citations
- Learn to Explain: Multimodal Reasoning via Thought Chains for Science Question AnsweringPan Lu, Swaroop Mishra, Tanglin Xia, Liang Qiu et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 2,727 citations
- Graph of Thoughts: Solving Elaborate Problems with Large Language ModelsMaciej Besta, Nils Blach, Ales Kubicek, Robert Gerstenberger et al.AAAI 2024 · 1,292 citations
Related papers
- Re-Align: Aligning Vision Language Models via Retrieval-Augmented Direct Preference OptimizationShuo Xing, Peiran Li, Yuping Wang, Ruizheng Bai et al.EMNLP 2025 · 2 citations
- Improve Vision Language Model Chain-of-thought ReasoningRuohong Zhang, Bowen Zhang, Yanghao Li, Haotian Zhang et al.ACL 2025 · 135 citations
- Language Bias in LVLMs: From In-Depth Analysis to Simple and Effective MitigationYangneng Chen, Jing LiICML 2026
- Sherlock: Self-Correcting Reasoning in Vision-Language ModelsYi Ding, Ruqi ZhangNeurIPS 2025 · 14 citations
- Perception in ReflectionYana Wei, Liang Zhao, Kangheng Lin, En Yu et al.ICML 2025
