A Lightweight IoT Cryptojacking Detection Mechanism in Heterogeneous Smart Home Networks
Ege Tekiner, Abbas Acar, A. Selcuk Uluagac
Abstract
—Recently, cryptojacking malware has become an easy way of reaching and profiting from a large number of victims. Prior works studied the cryptojacking detection systems focusing on both in-browser and host-based cryptojacking malware. However, none of these earlier works investigated different attack configurations and network settings in this context. For example, an attacker with an aggressive profit strategy may increase computational resources to the maximum utilization to benefit more in a short time, while a stealthy attacker may want to stay undetected longer time on the victim’s device. The accuracy of the detection mechanism may differ for an aggressive and stealthy attacker. Not only profit strategies, but also the cryptojacking malware type, the victim’s device as well as various network settings where the network is fully or partially compromised may play a key role in the performance evaluation of the detection mechanisms. In addition, smart home networks with multiple IoT devices are easily exploited by the attackers, and they are equipped to mine cryptocurrency on behalf of the attacker. However, no prior works investigated the impact of cryptojacking malware on IoT devices and compromised smart home networks. In this paper, we first propose an accurate and efficient IoT cryptojacking detection mechanism based on network traffic features, which can detect both in-browser and host-based cryptojacking. Then, we focus on the cryptojacking implementation problem on new device categories (e.g., IoT) and designed several novel experiment scenarios to assess our detection mechanism to cover the current attack surface of the attackers. Particularly, we tested our mechanism in various attack configurations and network settings. For this, we used a dataset of network traces consisting of 6 . 4 M network packets and showed that our detection algorithm can obtain accuracy as high as 99% with only one-hour of training data. To the best of our knowledge, this work is the first study focusing on IoT cryptojacking and the first study analyzing various attacker behaviors and network settings in the area of cryptojacking detection.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 1e89cb91-643b-42eb-8630-f2355a2b8f8aCited by top-tier papers10
- Point Cloud Analysis for ML-Based Malicious Traffic Detection: Reducing Majorities of False Positive AlarmsChuanpu Fu, Qi Li, Ke Xu, Jianping WuCCS 2023 · 30 citations
- EVOKE: Efficient Revocation of Verifiable Credentials in IoT NetworksCarlo Mazzocca, Abbas Acar, A. Selcuk Uluagac, Rebecca MontanariUSENIX Security 2024 · 22 citations
- MagTracer: Detecting GPU Cryptojacking Attacks via Magnetic Leakage SignalsRui Xiao, Tianyu Li, Soundarya Ramesh, Jun Han et al.MobiCom 2023 · 20 citations
- "Get in Researchers; We're Measuring Reproducibility": A Reproducibility Study of Machine Learning Papers in Tier 1 Security ConferencesDaniel Olszewski, Allison Lu, Carson Stillman, Kevin Warren et al.CCS 2023 · 19 citations
- Detecting Tunneled Flooding Traffic via Deep Semantic Analysis of Packet Length PatternsChuanpu Fu, Qi Li, Meng Shen, Ke XuCCS 2024 · 13 citations
Builds on5
- MineSweeper: An In-depth Look into Drive-by Cryptocurrency Mining and Its DefenseRadhesh Krishnan Konoth, Emanuele Vineti, Veelasha Moonsamy, Martina Lindorfer et al.CCS 2018 · 162 citations
- How You Get Shot in the Back: A Systematical Study about Cryptojacking in the Real WorldGeng Hong, Zhemin Yang, Sen Yang, Lei Zhang et al.CCS 2018 · 120 citations
- Inadvertently Making Cyber Criminals Rich: A Comprehensive Study of Cryptojacking Campaigns at Internet ScaleHugo L. J. Bijmans, Tim M. Booij, Christian DoerrUSENIX Security 2019 · 46 citations
- Just the Tip of the Iceberg: Internet-Scale Exploitation of Routers for CryptojackingHugo L. J. Bijmans, Tim M. Booij, Christian DoerrCCS 2019 · 32 citations
- MINOS: A Lightweight Real-Time Cryptojacking Detection SystemFaraz Naseem Naseem, Ahmet Aris, Leonardo Babun, Ege Tekiner et al.NDSS 2021
Related papers
- MinerRay: Semantics-Aware Analysis for Ever-Evolving Cryptojacking DetectionAlan Romano, Yunhui Zheng, Weihang WangASE 2020 · 30 citations
- Robbery on DevOps: Understanding and Mitigating Illicit Cryptomining on Continuous Integration Service PlatformsZhi Li, Weijie Liu, Hongbo Chen, XiaoFeng Wang et al.S&P 2022 · 19 citations
- Under the Dark: A Systematical Study of Stealthy Mining Pools (Ab)use in the WildZhenrui Zhang, Geng Hong, Xiang Li, Zhuoqun Fu et al.CCS 2023 · 9 citations
- MineShark: Cryptomining Traffic Detection at ScaleShaoke Xi, Tianyi Fu, Kai Bu, Chunling Yang et al.NDSS 2025
- When Does Wasm Malware Detection Fail? A Systematic Analysis of Their Robustness to EvasionTaeyoung Kim, Sanghak Oh, Kiho Lee, Weihang Wang et al.ASE 2025
