Controlling Large Language Model with Latent Action
Chengxing Jia, Ziniu Li, Pengyuan Wang, Yi-Chen Li, Zhenyu Hou, Yuxiao Dong, Yang Yu
Abstract
Adapting Large Language Models (LLMs) to downstream tasks using Reinforcement Learning (RL) has proven to be an effective approach. However, LLMs do not inherently define the structure of an agent for RL training, particularly in terms of specifying the action space. This paper studies learning a compact latent action space to enhance the controllability and exploration of RL for LLMs. Inspired by reinforcement learning from observations, we propose Controlling Large Language Models with Latent Actions (CoLA), a framework that integrates a latent action space into pre-trained LLMs. CoLA employs an inverse dynamics model to extract latent actions conditioned on future tokens, ensuring that the next token prediction is partially influenced by these actions. Simultaneously, CoLA fine-tunes the pre-trained LLM to function as a language world model, capable of incorporating latent actions as inputs. Additionally, CoLA trains a policy model to generate actions within this language world model. The policy model can be trained via behavior cloning to mimic a standard language model or through RL to maximize taskspecific rewards. In this work, we apply CoLA to the Llama-3.1-8B model. Our experiments demonstrate that, compared to RL with tokenlevel actions, CoLA's latent actions enable greater semantic diversity. For enhancing downstream tasks, we show that CoLA with RL achieves a score of 42.4 on the math500 benchmark, surpassing the baseline score of 38.2, and reaches 68.2 when augmented with a Monte Carlo Tree Search variant. Furthermore, CoLA with RL consistently improves performance on agent-based
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 1e882e7f-ff31-4140-bc85-01af537e622eCited by top-tier papers3
- Base Models Know How to Reason, Thinking Models Learn WhenConstantin Venhoff, Iván Arcuschin, Phil Torr, Arthur Conmy et al.ICML 2026 · 20 citations
- : Hierarchical Multi-Agent Decision-Making with LLM-Based Agents in Interactive EnvironmentsSangeun Park, Minhae KwonICML 2026
- Controlling Multimodal Conversational Agents with Coverage-Enhanced Latent ActionsYongqi Li, Hao Lang, Tieyun Qian, Yongbin LiACL 2026
Builds on25
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Let's Verify Step by StepHunter Lightman, Vineet Kosaraju, Yuri Burda, Harrison Edwards et al.ICLR 2024 · 3,045 citations
- Safe RLHF: Safe Reinforcement Learning from Human FeedbackJosef Dai, Xuehai Pan, Ruiyang Sun, Jiaming Ji et al.ICLR 2024 · 656 citations
Related papers
- Think Silently, Think Fast: Dynamic Latent Compression of LLM Reasoning ChainsWenhui Tan, Jiaze Li, Jianzhong Ju, Zhenbo Luo et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 103 citations
- Co-Evolving Latent Action World ModelsYucen Wang, Fengming Zhang, De-Chuan Zhan, Li Zhao et al.ICML 2026 · 12 citations
- Learning to Act without ActionsDominik Schmidt, Minqi JiangICLR 2024 · 98 citations
- Executable Code Actions Elicit Better LLM AgentsXingyao Wang, Yangyi Chen, Lifan Yuan, Yizhe Zhang et al.ICML 2024 · 436 citations
- Hybrid Latent Reasoning via Reinforcement LearningZhenrui Yue, Bowen Jin, Huimin Zeng, Honglei Zhuang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 28 citations
