Instance Compression, Revisited
Gal Arnon, Shany Ben-David, Eylon Yogev
Abstract
Collision-resistant hashing (CRH) is a cornerstone of cryptographic protocols. However, despite decades of research, no construction of a CRH based solely on one-way functions has been found. Moreover, there are black-box limitations that separate these two primitives.
Harnik and Naor [HN10] overcame this black-box barrier by introducing the notion of instance compression. Instance compression reduces large NP instances to a size that depends on their witness size while preserving the "correctness" of the instance relative to the language. Shortly thereafter, Fortnow and Santhanam showed that efficient instance compression algorithms are unlikely to exist (as the polynomial hierarchy would collapse). Bronfman and Rothblum defined a computational analog of instance compression, which they called computational instance compression (CIC), and gave a construction of CIC under standard assumptions. Unfortunately, this notion is not strong enough to replace instance compression in Harnik and Naor's CRH construction.
In this work, we revisit the notion of computation instance compression and ask what the "correct" notion for CIC is, in the sense that it is sufficiently strong to achieve useful cryptographic primitives while remaining consistent with common assumptions. First, we give a natural strengthening of the CIC definition that serves as a direct substitute for the instance compression scheme in the Harnik--Naor construction. However, we show that even this notion is unlikely to exist.
We then identify a notion of CIC that gives new hope for constructing CRH from one-way functions via instance compression. We observe that this notion is achievable under standard assumptions and, by revisiting the Harnik--Naor proof, demonstrate that it is sufficiently strong to achieve CRH. In fact, we show that our CIC notion is existentially equivalent to CRH.
Beyond Minicrypt, Harnik and Naor showed that a strengthening of instance compression can be used to construct OT and public-key encryption. We rule out the computational analog of this stronger notion by showing that it contradicts the existence of incompressible public-key encryption, which was recently constructed under standard assumptions.
Ask about this paper
Ask your agent about it.
Lune has read the top-tier papers around this one, so every answer names the papers it rests on.
Your agent calls
Lunesearch_papers
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers get 1deebcc6-5f0c-4898-9d7d-fa7de71d0356Related papers
- Better Than Advertised: Improved Collision-Resistance Guarantees for MD-Based Hash FunctionsMihir Bellare, Joseph Jaeger, Julia LenCCS 2017 · 9 citations
- Collision-Resistance from Multi-Collision-ResistanceRon D. Rothblum, Prashant Nalini VasudevanCRYPTO 2022 · 8 citations
- Hard Languages in NP ∩ coNP and NIZK Proofs from Unstructured HardnessRiddhi Ghosal, Yuval Ishai, Alexis Korb, Eyal Kushilevitz et al.STOC 2023 · 1 citation
- Non-adaptive Universal One-Way Hash Functions from Arbitrary One-Way FunctionsXinyu Mao, Noam Mazor, Jiapeng ZhangEUROCRYPT 2023 · 1 citation
- On One-way Functions and Kolmogorov ComplexityYanyi Liu, Rafael PassFOCS 2020 · 39 citations
