Automating Legal Interpretation with LLMs: Retrieval, Generation, and Evaluation
Kangcheng Luo, Quzhe Huang, Cong Jiang, Yansong Feng
Abstract
Interpreting the law is always essential for the law to adapt to the ever-changing society. It is a critical and challenging task even for legal practitioners, as it requires meticulous and professional annotations and summarizations by legal experts, which are admittedly time-consuming and expensive to collect at scale. To alleviate the burden on legal experts, we propose a method for automated legal interpretation. Specifically, by emulating doctrinal legal research, we introduce a novel framework, ATRIE, to address Legal Concept Interpretation, a typical task in legal interpretation. ATRIE utilizes large language models (LLMs) to AuTomatically Retrieve concept-related information, Interpret legal concepts, and Evaluate generated interpretations, eliminating dependence on legal experts. ATRIE comprises a legal concept interpreter and a legal concept interpretation evaluator. The interpreter uses LLMs to retrieve relevant information from previous cases and interpret legal concepts. The evaluator uses performance changes on Legal Concept Entailment, a downstream task we propose, as a proxy of interpretation quality. Automated and multifaceted human evaluations indicate that the quality of our interpretations is comparable to those written by legal experts, with superior comprehensiveness and readability. Although there remains a slight gap in accuracy, it can already assist legal practitioners in improving the efficiency of legal interpretation.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on3
- Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP TasksPatrick Lewis, Ethan Perez, Aleksandra Piktus, Fabio Petroni et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 19,162 citations
- Retrieval Augmented Language Model Pre-TrainingKelvin Guu, Kenton Lee, Zora Tung, Panupong Pasupat et al.ICML 2020 · 2,937 citations
- Leveraging Large Language Models for Learning Complex Legal Concepts through StorytellingHang Jiang, Xiajie Zhang, Robert Mahari, Daniel T. Kessler et al.ACL 2024 · 12 citations
Related papers
- Learning Interpretable Legal Case Retrieval via Knowledge-Guided Case ReformulationChenlong Deng, Kelong Mao, Zhicheng DouEMNLP 2024 · 3 citations
- ConSim: Measuring Concept-Based Explanations' Effectiveness with Automated SimulatabilityAntonin Poché, Alon Jacovi, Agustin Martin Picard, Victor Boutin et al.ACL 2025 · 8 citations
- GLARE: Agentic Reasoning for Legal Judgment PredictionXinyu Yang, Chenlong Deng, Zhicheng DouACL 2026 · 5 citations
- Auto-PRE: An Automatic and Cost-Efficient Peer-Review Framework for Language Generation EvaluationJunjie Chen, Weihang Su, Zhumin Chu, Haitao Li et al.AAAI 2026
- Mitigating Legal Hallucinations via Symbolic Constraints and Analogical PrecedentsZixuan Huang, Yanxiang Ma, Luhan Wang, Yunke Wang et al.ACL 2026
