Large Language Models can Become Strong Self-Detoxifiers
Ching-Yun Ko, Pin-Yu Chen, Payel Das, Youssef Mroueh, Soham Dan, Georgios Kollias, Subhajit Chaudhury, Tejaswini Pedapati, Luca Daniel
Abstract
Reducing the likelihood of generating harmful and toxic output is an essential task when aligning large language models (LLMs). Existing methods mainly rely on training an external reward model (i.e., another language model) or fine-tuning the LLM using self-generated data to influence the outcome. In this paper, we show that LLMs have the capability of self-detoxification without external reward model learning or retraining of the LM. We propose Self-disciplined Autoregressive Sampling (SASA), a lightweight controlled decoding algorithm for toxicity reduction of LLMs. SASA leverages the contextual representations from an LLM to learn linear subspaces from labeled data characterizing toxic v.s. non-toxic output in analytical forms. When auto-completing a response token-by-token, SASA dynamically tracks the margin of the current output to steer the generation away from the toxic subspace, by adjusting the autoregressive sampling strategy. Evaluated on LLMs of different scale and nature, namely Llama-3.1-Instruct (8B), Llama-2 (7B), and GPT2-L models with the RealToxicityPrompts, BOLD, and AttaQ benchmarks, SASA markedly enhances the quality of the generated sentences relative to the original models and attains comparable performance to state-of-the-art detoxification techniques, significantly reducing the toxicity level by only using the LLM's internal representations.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 1d655e90-27d9-4d17-bebd-d17fcb2b8ec3Cited by top-tier papers3
- IF-Guide: Influence Function-Guided Detoxification of LLMsZachary Coalson, Juhan Bae, Nicholas Carlini, Sanghyun HongNeurIPS 2025 · 9 citations
- Test-Time Detoxification without Training or Learning AnythingBaturay Saglam, Dionysios KalogeriasICML 2026 · 2 citations
- GP-MoLFormer-Sim: Test Time Molecular Optimization Through Contextual Similarity GuidanceJirí Navrátil, Jarret Ross, Payel Das, Youssef Mroueh et al.AAAI 2026 · 1 citation
Builds on18
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Large Language Models are Zero-Shot ReasonersTakeshi Kojima, Shixiang Shane Gu, Machel Reid, Yutaka Matsuo et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 8,168 citations
- The Curious Case of Neural Text DegenerationAri Holtzman, Jan Buys, Li Du, Maxwell Forbes et al.ICLR 2020 · 4,112 citations
- Plug and Play Language Models: A Simple Approach to Controlled Text GenerationSumanth Dathathri, Andrea Madotto, Janice Lan, Jane Hung et al.ICLR 2020 · 1,166 citations
Related papers
- Breaking Bad Tokens: Detoxification of LLMs Using Sparse AutoencodersAgam Goyal, Vedant Rathi, William Yeh, Yian Wang et al.EMNLP 2025 · 1 citation
- Leashing the Inner Demons: Self-Detoxification for Language ModelsCanwen Xu, Zexue He, Zhankui He, Julian J. McAuleyAAAI 2022 · 30 citations
- Self-Detoxifying Language Models via Toxification ReversalChak Tou Leong, Yi Cheng, Jiashuo Wang, Jian Wang et al.EMNLP 2023 · 12 citations
- Exploring the Limits of Domain-Adaptive Training for Detoxifying Large-Scale Language ModelsBoxin Wang, Wei Ping, Chaowei Xiao, Peng Xu et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 89 citations
- DSCD: Large Language Model Detoxification with Self-Constrained DecodingMing Dong, Jinkui Zhang, Bolong Zheng, Xinhui Tu et al.EMNLP 2025 · 1 citation
