Multi-Action Self-Improvement For Neural Combinatorial Optimization
Laurin Luttmann, Lin Xie
Abstract
Self-improvement has emerged as a state-of-the-art paradigm in Neural Combinatorial Optimization (NCO), where models iteratively refine their policies by generating and imitating high-quality solutions. Despite strong empirical performance, existing methods face key limitations. Training is computationally expensive, as policy updates require sampling numerous candidate solutions per instance to extract a single expert trajectory. More fundamentally, these approaches fail to exploit the structure of combinatorial problems involving the coordination of multiple agents, such as vehicles in min-max routing or machines in scheduling. By supervising on single-action trajectories, they fail to exploit agent-permutation symmetries, where distinct sequences of actions yield identical solutions, hindering generalization and the ability to learn coordinated behavior.
We address these challenges by extending self-improvement to operate over joint multi-agent actions. Our model architecture predicts complete agent-task assignments jointly at each decision step. To explicitly leverage symmetries, we employ a set-prediction loss, which supervises the policy on multiple expert assignments for any given state. This approach enhances sample efficiency and the model's ability to learn coordinated behavior. Furthermore, by generating multi-agent actions in parallel, it drastically accelerates the solution generation phase of the self-improvement loop. Empirically, we validate our method on several combinatorial problems, demonstrating consistent improvements in the quality of the final solution and a reduced generation latency compared to standard self-improvement.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 1d56dc19-1eeb-48e2-b230-46413467a96eCited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on15
- POMO: Policy Optimization with Multiple Optima for Reinforcement LearningYeong-Dae Kwon, Jinho Choo, Byoungjip Kim, Iljoo Yoon et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 731 citations
- DIFUSCO: Graph-based Diffusion Solvers for Combinatorial OptimizationZhiqing Sun, Yiming YangNeurIPS 2023 · 356 citations
- Neural Combinatorial Optimization with Heavy Decoder: Toward Large Scale GeneralizationFu Luo, Xi Lin, Fei Liu, Qingfu Zhang et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 248 citations
- Generalize a Small Pre-trained Model to Arbitrarily Large TSP InstancesZhang-Hua Fu, Kai-Bin Qiu, Hongyuan ZhaAAAI 2021 · 247 citations
- Sym-NCO: Leveraging Symmetricity for Neural Combinatorial OptimizationMinsu Kim, Junyoung Park, Jinkyoo ParkNeurIPS 2022 · 200 citations
Related papers
- Self-Labeling the Job Shop Scheduling ProblemAndrea Corsini, Angelo Porrello, Simone Calderara, Mauro Dell'AmicoNeurIPS 2024 · 39 citations
- MaskCO: Masked Generation Drives Effective Representation Learning and Exploiting for Combinatorial OptimizationLvda Chen, Yang Li, Junchi YanICLR 2026
- Boosting Neural Combinatorial Optimization for Large-Scale Vehicle Routing ProblemsFu Luo, Xi Lin, Yaoxin Wu, Zhenkun Wang et al.ICLR 2025
- Towards Generalizable Multi-Policy Optimization with Self-Evolution for Job SchedulingInguk Choi, Woo-Jin Shin, Sang-Hyun Cho, Hyun-Jung KimNeurIPS 2025 · 4 citations
- Efficient Meta Neural Heuristic for Multi-Objective Combinatorial OptimizationJinbiao Chen, Jiahai Wang, Zizhen Zhang, Zhiguang Cao et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 35 citations
