Don't be lazy: CompleteP enables compute-efficient deep transformers
Nolan Dey, Bin Claire Zhang, Lorenzo Noci, Mufan Bill Li, Blake Bordelon, Shane Bergsma, Cengiz Pehlevan, Boris Hanin, Joel Hestness
Abstract
We study compute efficiency of LLM training when using different parameterizations, i.e., rules for adjusting model and optimizer hyperparameters (HPs) as model size changes. Some parameterizations fail to transfer optimal base HPs (such as learning rate) across changes in model depth, requiring practitioners to either re-tune these HPs as they scale up (expensive), or accept sub-optimal training when re-tuning is prohibitive. Even when they achieve HP transfer, we develop theory to show parameterizations may still exist in the lazy learning regime where layers learn only features close to their linearization, preventing effective use of depth and nonlinearity. Finally, we identify and adopt the parameterization we call CompleteP that achieves both depth-wise HP transfer and non-lazy learning in all layers. CompleteP enables a wider range of model width/depth ratios to remain compute-efficient, unlocking shapes better suited for different hardware settings and operational contexts. Moreover, CompleteP enables 12-34% compute efficiency improvements over the prior state-of-the-art. All experiments were run on Cerebras CS-3 systems. A minimal implementation is available at https://github.com/EleutherAI/nanoGPT-mup/tree/completep.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers19
- Power Lines: Scaling laws for weight decay and batch size in LLM pre-trainingShane Bergsma, Nolan Dey, Gurpreet Gosal, Gavia Gray et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 44 citations
- Exact Expressive Power of Transformers with PaddingWilliam Merrill, Ashish SabharwalNeurIPS 2025 · 21 citations
- μPC: Scaling Predictive Coding to 100+ Layer NetworksFrancesco Innocenti, El Mehdi Achour, Christopher L. BuckleyNeurIPS 2025 · 19 citations
- Hyperparameter Transfer Enables Consistent Gains of Matrix-Preconditioned Optimizers Across ScalesShikai Qiu, Charlie Chen, Hoang Phan, Qi Lei et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 17 citations
- Weight Decay may matter more than µP for Learning Rate Transfer in PracticeAtli Kosson, Jeremy Welborn, Yang Liu, Martin Jaggi et al.ICLR 2026 · 11 citations
Builds on36
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- PIQA: Reasoning about Physical Commonsense in Natural LanguageYonatan Bisk, Rowan Zellers, Ronan Le Bras, Jianfeng Gao et al.AAAI 2020 · 2,916 citations
- Pythia: A Suite for Analyzing Large Language Models Across Training and ScalingStella Biderman, Hailey Schoelkopf, Quentin Gregory Anthony, Herbie Bradley et al.ICML 2023 · 1,822 citations
- FlexGen: High-Throughput Generative Inference of Large Language Models with a Single GPUYing Sheng, Lianmin Zheng, Binhang Yuan, Zhuohan Li et al.ICML 2023 · 683 citations
- An empirical analysis of compute-optimal large language model trainingJordan Hoffmann, Sebastian Borgeaud, Arthur Mensch, Elena Buchatskaya et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 566 citations
Related papers
- Completed Hyperparameter Transfer across Modules, Width, Depth, Batch and DurationBruno Mlodozeniec, Pierre Ablin, Louis Béthune, Dan Busbridge et al.ICLR 2026 · 24 citations
- Understanding the Mechanisms of Fast Hyperparameter TransferNikhil Ghosh, Denny Wu, Alberto BiettiICLR 2026 · 8 citations
- CompleteP for RL: Maintaining Feature Learning When Scaling Deep Reinforcement LearningAdam Lee, M Ganesh Kumar, Blake Bordelon, Cengiz PehlevanICML 2026
- Hyperparameter Transfer Laws for Non-Recurrent Multi-Path Neural NetworksHaosong Zhang, Shenxi Wu, Xingjian Ma, Shirui Bian et al.ICML 2026 · 1 citation
- Tuning Large Neural Networks via Zero-Shot Hyperparameter TransferGe Yang, Edward J. Hu, Igor Babuschkin, Szymon Sidor et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 208 citations
