Moving Beyond Set-It-And-Forget-It Privacy Settings on Social Media
Mainack Mondal, Günce Su Yilmaz, Noah Hirsch, Mohammad Taha Khan, Michael Tang, Christopher Tran, Chris Kanich, Blase Ur, Elena Zheleva
Abstract
When users post on social media, they protect their privacy by choosing an access control setting that is rarely revisited. Changes in users' lives and relationships, as well as social media platforms themselves, can cause mismatches between a post's active privacy setting and the desired setting. The importance of managing this setting combined with the high volume of potential friend-post pairs needing evaluation necessitate a semi-automated approach. We attack this problem through a combination of a user study and the development of automated inference of potentially mismatched privacy settings. A total of 78 Facebook users reevaluated the privacy settings for five of their Facebook posts, also indicating whether a selection of friends should be able to access each post. They also explained their decision. With this user data, we designed a classifier to identify posts with currently incorrect sharing settings. This classifier shows a 317% improvement over a baseline classifier based on friend interaction. We also find that many of the most useful features can be collected without user intervention, and we identify directions for improving the classifier's accuracy. CCS CONCEPTS • Security and privacy → Usability in security and privacy.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers6
- "Get in Researchers; We're Measuring Reproducibility": A Reproducibility Study of Machine Learning Papers in Tier 1 Security ConferencesDaniel Olszewski, Allison Lu, Carson Stillman, Kevin Warren et al.CCS 2023 · 19 citations
- To Self-Persuade or be Persuaded: Examining Interventions for Users' Privacy Setting SelectionIsadora Krsek, Kimi Wenzel, Sauvik Das, Jason I. Hong et al.CHI 2022 · 14 citations
- Everyone's Privacy Matters! An Analysis of Privacy Leakage from Real-World Facial Images on Twitter and Associated User BehaviorsYuqi Niu, Weidong Qiu, Peng Tang, Lifan Wang et al.CSCW 2025 · 3 citations
- Understanding Privacy Switching Behaviour on TwitterDilara Keküllüoglu, Kami Vaniea, Walid MagdyCHI 2022 · 1 citation
- Empirical Understanding of Deletion Privacy: Experiences, Expectations, and MeasuresMohsen Minaei, Mainack Mondal, Aniket KateUSENIX Security 2022
Builds on1
Related papers
- Analyzing the Impact and Accuracy of Facebook Activity on Facebook's Ad-Interest Inference ProcessAafaq Sabir, Evan Lafontaine, Anupam DasCSCW 2022 · 11 citations
- Demystifying Hidden Privacy Settings in Mobile AppsYi Chen, Mingming Zha, Nan Zhang, Dandan Xu et al.S&P 2019 · 39 citations
- Exploring the Utility Versus Intrusiveness of Dynamic Audience Selection on FacebookSindhu Kiranmai Ernala, Stephanie S. Yang, Yuxi Wu, Rachel Chen et al.CSCW 2021 · 11 citations
- The Feasibility of Dynamically Granted Permissions: Aligning Mobile Privacy with User PreferencesPrimal Wijesekera, Arjun Baokar, Lynn Tsai, Joel Reardon et al.S&P 2017 · 156 citations
- 'I have too much respect for my elders': Understanding South African Mobile Users' Perceptions of Privacy and Current Behaviors on Facebook and WhatsAppJake Reichel, Fleming C. Peck, Mikako Inaba, Bisrat Moges et al.USENIX Security 2020
