Debiased-CAM to mitigate image perturbations with faithful visual explanations of machine learning
Wencan Zhang, Mariella Dimiccoli, Brian Y. Lim
Abstract
Model explanations such as saliency maps can improve user trust in AI by highlighting important features for a prediction. However, these become distorted and misleading when explaining predictions of images that are subject to systematic error (bias) by perturbations and corruptions. Furthermore, the distortions persist despite model fine-tuning on images biased by different factors (blur, color temperature, day/night). We present Debiased-CAM to recover explanation faithfulness across various bias types and levels by training a multi-input, multi-task model with auxiliary tasks for explanation and bias level predictions. In simulation studies, the approach not only enhanced prediction accuracy, but also generated highly faithful explanations about these predictions as if the images were unbiased. In user studies, debiased explanations improved user task performance, perceived truthfulness and perceived helpfulness. Debiased training can provide a versatile platform for robust performance and explanation faithfulness for a wide range of applications with data biases.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers3
- Towards Relatable Explainable AI with the Perceptual ProcessWencan Zhang, Brian Y. LimCHI 2022 · 62 citations
- Gesture-aware Interactive Machine Teaching with In-situ Object AnnotationsZhongyi Zhou, Koji YataniUIST 2022 · 20 citations
- Comparables XAI: Faithful Example-based AI Explanations with Counterfactual Trace AdjustmentsYifan Zhang, Tianle Ren, Fei Wang, Brian Y. LimCHI 2026 · 1 citation
Builds on13
- A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual RepresentationsTing Chen, Simon Kornblith, Mohammad Norouzi, Geoffrey E. HintonICML 2020 · 24,064 citations
- Concept Bottleneck ModelsPang Wei Koh, Thao Nguyen, Yew Siang Tang, Stephen Mussmann et al.ICML 2020 · 1,233 citations
- Does the Whole Exceed its Parts? The Effect of AI Explanations on Complementary Team PerformanceGagan Bansal, Tongshuang Wu, Joyce Zhou, Raymond Fok et al.CHI 2021 · 713 citations
- Manipulating and Measuring Model InterpretabilityForough Poursabzi-Sangdeh, Daniel G. Goldstein, Jake M. Hofman, Jennifer Wortman Vaughan et al.CHI 2021 · 663 citations
- Interpreting Interpretability: Understanding Data Scientists' Use of Interpretability Tools for Machine LearningHarmanpreet Kaur, Harsha Nori, Samuel Jenkins, Rich Caruana et al.CHI 2020 · 541 citations
Related papers
- Unraveling the Dilemma of AI Errors: Exploring the Effectiveness of Human and Machine Explanations for Large Language ModelsMarvin Pafla, Kate Larson, Mark HancockCHI 2024 · 16 citations
- The Impact of Imperfect XAI on Human-AI Decision-MakingKatelyn Morrison, Philipp Spitzer, Violet Turri, Michelle Feng et al.CSCW 2024 · 60 citations
- Walk the Talk? Measuring the Faithfulness of Large Language Model ExplanationsKatie Matton, Robert Osazuwa Ness, John V. Guttag, Emre KicimanICLR 2025
- Faithful Serum: Mitigating the Faithfulness Gap in Textual Explanations of LLM Decisions via Attribution GuidanceBar Alon, Itamar Zimerman, Lior WolfACL 2026
- Uncalibrated Models Can Improve Human-AI CollaborationKailas Vodrahalli, Tobias Gerstenberg, James Y. ZouNeurIPS 2022 · 47 citations
