Lune

PLDI2026Top-tier venue

Evolving Abstract Transformers for Gradient-Guided, Adaptable Abstract Interpretation

Shaurya Gomber, Debangshu Banerjee, Gagandeep Singh

2026Year
1Top-tier citations

Abstract

interpretation relies on fixed, hand-crafted, instruction-specific transformers tailored to each domain, giving rise to three significant limitations. First, extensibility is limited because transformers cannot be reused across domains and new transformers need to be designed for each new domain or operator. Second, precise compositional reasoning over instruction sequences is difficult as transformers are defined only at the instruction level. Third, all downstream tasks are forced to use the same fixed transformer, irrespective of their precision, efficiency, or task-specific requirements. To address these limitations, we propose the Evolving Abstract Transformer, a general transformer that replaces the fixed single-output design of traditional transformers with an adaptable search over a parametric space of sound outputs. This is achieved through two underlying algorithms we develop. First, the Universal Parametric Output Space Encoder (UPOSE) constructs a compact parametric space of sound outputs for any polyhedral numerical domain and any operator in the Quadratic-Bounded Guarded Operators (QGO) class which includes both individual instructions and structured sequences. Next, the Adaptive Gradient Guidance (AGG) algorithm leverages the differentiable structure of the space generated by UPOSE and uses gradient-based updates to efficiently search it according to downstream analysis objectives and available runtime, continually evolving the output as more time is provided. We implement these ideas in the AbsEvolve framework and evaluate their effectiveness across three numerical abstract domains: Zones, Octagons, and Polyhedra. Our results demonstrate that the evolving transformer works across domains and handles diverse instructions and sequences, allowing efficient adaptability in the precision-efficiency tradeoff by adjusting the number of gradient steps in the search, while also reaching the most precise invariants up to 3.2× faster than existing baselines.

• Software and its engineering → Automated static analysis.

Ask about this paper

Your agent reads all of it.

Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.

Questions to start from

Your agent calls

Luneget_paper_fulltext

Ask in Lune

Free to start. No credit card required.

lune papers fulltext 1c915ab7-a0e5-4374-9fcf-0eef6c26d9f8

Cited by top-tier papers1

Ask how each one uses it

Builds on13

Related papers

Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines