Ethical Tensions in Applications of AI for Addressing Human Trafficking: A Human Rights Perspective
Julia Deeb-Swihart, Alex Endert, Amy S. Bruckman
Abstract
In the last two decades, human trafficking (where individuals are forcibly exploited for the profits of another) has seen increased attention from the artificial intelligence (AI) community. Clear focus on the ethical risks of this research is critical given that those risks are disproportionately born by already vulnerable populations. To understand and subsequently address these risks, we conducted a systematic literature review of computing research leveraging AI to combat human trafficking and apply a framework using principles from international human rights law to categorize ethical risks. This paper uncovers a number of ethical tensions including bias endemic in datasets, privacy risks stemming from data collection and reporting, and issues concerning potential misuse. We conclude by highlighting four suggestions for future research: broader use of participatory design; engaging with other forms of trafficking; developing best practices for harm prevention; and including transparent ethics disclosures in research. We find that there are significant gaps in what aspects of human trafficking researchers have focused on. Most research to date focuses on aiding criminal investigations in cases of sex trafficking, but more work is needed to support other anti-trafficking activities like supporting survivors, adequately address labor trafficking, and support more diverse survivor populations including transgender and nonbinary individuals.
Ask about this paper
Ask your agent about it.
Lune has read the top-tier papers around this one, so every answer names the papers it rests on.
Your agent calls
Lunesearch_papers
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers get 1c90675e-34e4-4250-a4fd-e2b5ec964b15Cited by top-tier papers2
- Participatory AI Considerations for Advancing Racial Health EquityAndrea G. Parker, Laura M. Vardoulakis, Jatin Alla, Christina N. HarringtonCHI 2025 · 15 citations
- Digital Technologies and Human Trafficking: Combating Coercive Control and Navigating Digital AutonomySophie Stephenson, Lana Ramjit, Thomas Ristenpart, Nicola DellCHI 2025 · 6 citations
Related papers
- "Just Like, Risking Your Life Here": Participatory Design of User Interactions with Risk Detection AI to Prevent Online-to-Offline Harm Through Dating AppsIsha Datey, Douglas ZytkoCSCW 2024 · 11 citations
- What is Human-Centered about Human-Centered AI? A Map of the Research LandscapeTara Capel, Margot BreretonCHI 2023 · 218 citations
- A Human-Centered Systematic Literature Review of the Computational Approaches for Online Sexual Risk DetectionAfsaneh Razi, Seunghyun Kim, Ashwaq Alsoubai, Gianluca Stringhini et al.CSCW 2021 · 93 citations
- Harassment in Virtual Reality: A Systematic ReviewJiong Dong, Yijun Lu, Shuai Wu, Yuyin Ma et al.CHI 2026 · 1 citation
- The Dark Side of AI Companionship: A Taxonomy of Harmful Algorithmic Behaviors in Human-AI RelationshipsRenwen Zhang, Han Li, Han Meng, Jinyuan Zhan et al.CHI 2025 · 122 citations
