Squirrel: Efficient Synchronized Multi-Signatures from Lattices
Nils Fleischhacker, Mark Simkin, Zhenfei Zhang
Abstract
The focus of this work are multi-signatures schemes in the synchronized setting. A multisignature scheme allows multiple signatures for the same message but from independent signers to be compressed into one short aggregated signature, which allows verifying all of the signatures simultaneously. In the synchronized setting, the signing algorithm takes the current time step as an additional input. It is assumed that no signer signs more than one message per time step and we aim to aggregate signatures for the same message and same time step. This setting is particularly useful in the context of blockchains, where validators are naturally synchronized by the blocks they sign. We present Squirrel, a concretely efficient lattice-based multi-signature scheme in the synchronized setting that works for a bounded number of 2 τ time steps and allows for aggregating up to ρ signatures at each step, where both τ and ρ are public parameters upon which the efficiency of our scheme depends. Squirrel allows for non-interactive aggregation of independent signatures and is proven secure in the random oracle model in the presence of rogue-key attacks assuming the hardness of the short integer solution problem in a polynomial ring. We provide a careful analysis of all parameters and show that Squirrel can be instantiated with good concrete efficiency. For τ = 24 and ρ = 4096, a signer could sign a new message every 10 seconds for 5 years non-stop. Assuming the signer has a cache of 112 MB, signing takes 68 ms and verification of an aggregated signature takes 36 ms. The size of the public key is 1 KB, the size of an individual signature is 52 KB, and the size of an aggregated signature is 771 KB.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers4
- Succinct Vector, Polynomial, and Functional Commitments from LatticesHoeteck Wee, David J. WuEUROCRYPT 2023 · 54 citations
- Aggregating Falcon Signatures with LaBRADORMarius A. Aardal, Diego F. Aranha, Katharina Boudgoust, Sebastian Kolby et al.CRYPTO 2024 · 23 citations
- Pixel+ and Pixel++: Compact and Efficient Forward-Secure Multi-Signatures for PoS Blockchain ConsensusJianghong Wei, Guohua Tian, Ding Wang, Fuchun Guo et al.USENIX Security 2024 · 9 citations
- Olingo: Threshold Lattice Signatures with DKG and Identifiable AbortKamil Doruk Gur, Patrick Hough, Jonathan Katz, Caroline Sandsbråten et al.CCS 2026
Builds on6
- Post-quantum Key Exchange - A New HopeErdem Alkim, Léo Ducas, Thomas Pöppelmann, Peter SchwabeUSENIX Security 2016 · 972 citations
- The SPHINCS+ Signature FrameworkDaniel J. Bernstein, Andreas Hülsing, Stefan Kölbl, Ruben Niederhagen et al.CCS 2019 · 385 citations
- MuSig2: Simple Two-Round Schnorr Multi-signaturesJonas Nick, Tim Ruffing, Yannick SeurinCRYPTO 2021 · 147 citations
- MuSig-L: Lattice-Based Multi-signature with Single-Round Online PhaseCecilia Boschini, Akira Takahashi, Mehdi TibouchiCRYPTO 2022 · 54 citations
- Classical vs Quantum Random OraclesTakashi Yamakawa, Mark ZhandryEUROCRYPT 2021 · 43 citations
Related papers
- DualMS 2.0: Practical Lattice-Based Two-Round Fiat-Shamir Multi-Signature with Better EfficiencyQiqi Lai, Chongshen Chen, Feng Hao Liu, Tianyu Zhao et al.CCS 2026
- DahLIAS: Discrete Logarithm-Based Interactive Aggregate SignaturesJonas Nick, Tim Ruffing, Yannick SeurinEUROCRYPT 2026
- Loquat: A SNARK-Friendly Post-quantum Signature Based on the Legendre PRF with Applications in Ring and Aggregate SignaturesXinyu Zhang, Ron Steinfeld, Muhammed F. Esgin, Joseph K. Liu et al.CRYPTO 2024 · 6 citations
- Squirrel: A Scalable Secure Two-Party Computation Framework for Training Gradient Boosting Decision TreeWen-jie Lu, Zhicong Huang, Qizhi Zhang, Yuchen Wang et al.USENIX Security 2023
- On the Security of Two-Round Multi-SignaturesManu Drijvers, Kasra Edalatnejad, Bryan Ford, Eike Kiltz et al.S&P 2019 · 126 citations
