"Shall We Dig Deeper?": Designing and Evaluating Strategies for LLM Agents to Advance Knowledge Co-Construction in Asynchronous Online Discussions
Yuanhao Zhang, Wenbo Li, Xiaoyu Wang, Kangyu Yuan, Shuai Ma, Xiaojuan Ma
Abstract
Asynchronous online discussions enable diverse participants to co-construct knowledge beyond individual contributions. This process ideally evolves through sequential phases, from superficial information exchange to deeper synthesis. However, many discussions stagnate in the early stages. Existing AI interventions typically target isolated phases, lacking mechanisms to progressively advance knowledge co-construction, and the impacts of different intervention styles in this context remain unclear and warrant investigation. To address these gaps, we conducted a design workshop to explore AI intervention strategies (task-oriented and/or relationship-oriented) throughout the knowledge co-construction process, and implemented them in an LLM-powered agent capable of facilitating progression while consolidating foundations at each phase. A within-subject study (N=60) involving five consecutive asynchronous discussions showed that the agent consistently promoted deeper knowledge progression, with different styles exerting distinct effects on both content and experience. These findings provide actionable guidance for designing adaptive AI agents that sustain more constructive online discussions.
• Human-centered computing → Interactive systems and tools; Empirical studies in HCI .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 1bbe3702-b048-4838-a768-7a96e3af7239Cited by top-tier papers2
- When LLMs Enter Everyday Feminism on Chinese Social Media: Opportunities and Risks for Women's EmpowermentRunhua Zhang, Ziqi Pan, Kangyu Yuan, Qiaoyi Chen et al.CHI 2026 · 1 citation
- Collaborative Disagreement Resolution for Scalable OversightYuyang Jiang, Chacha Chen, Teng Wu, Liwen Sun et al.ICML 2026
Builds on27
- LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language ModelsEdward J. Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu et al.ICLR 2022 · 18,833 citations
- "An Ideal Human": Expectations of AI Teammates in Human-AI TeamingRui Zhang, Nathan J. McNeese, Guo Freeman, Geoff MusickCSCW 2020 · 222 citations
- Who Should I Trust: AI or Myself? Leveraging Human and AI Correctness Likelihood to Promote Appropriate Trust in AI-Assisted Decision-MakingShuai Ma, Ying Lei, Xinru Wang, Chengbo Zheng et al.CHI 2023 · 139 citations
- Bot in the Bunch: Facilitating Group Chat Discussion by Improving Efficiency and Participation with a ChatbotSoomin Kim, Jinsu Eun, Changhoon Oh, Bongwon Suh et al.CHI 2020 · 132 citations
- RePrompt: Automatic Prompt Editing to Refine AI-Generative Art Towards Precise ExpressionsYunlong Wang, Shuyuan Shen, Brian Y. LimCHI 2023 · 118 citations
Related papers
- Maintaining "Balanced" Conflict: Proactive Intervention Strategies of AI Voice Agents in Online Collaboration of Temporary Design TeamsXinhui Chen, Xiang Yuan, Hui Zhang, Ruixiao Zheng et al.CHI 2025 · 6 citations
- Assistance or Disruption? Exploring and Evaluating the Design and Trade-offs of Proactive AI Programming SupportKevin Pu, Daniel Lazaro, Ian Arawjo, Haijun Xia et al.CHI 2025 · 31 citations
- Productive vs. Reflective: How Different Ways of Integrating AI into Design Workflows Affect Cognition and MotivationXiaotong (Tone) Xu, Arina Konnova, Bianca Gao, Cindy Peng et al.CHI 2025 · 41 citations
- Does My Chatbot Have an Agenda? Understanding Human and AI Agency in Human-Human-like Chatbot InteractionBhada Yun, Evgenia Taranova, April Yi WangCHI 2026 · 3 citations
- Partnering with Generative AI: Experimental Evaluation of Model-Led and Human-Led Interaction in Human-AI Co-CreationSebastian Maier, Manuel Schneider, Stefan FeuerriegelCHI 2026 · 5 citations
