Lune

ICML2023Top-tier venue

How much does Initialization Affect Generalization?

Sameera Ramasinghe, Lachlan Ewen MacDonald, Moshiur R. Farazi, Hemanth Saratchandran, Simon Lucey

2023Year
9Citations
4Top-tier citations

Abstract

Characterizing the remarkable generalization properties of over-parameterized neural networks remains an open problem. A growing body of recent literature shows that the bias of stochastic gradient descent (SGD) and architecture choice implicitly leads to better generalization. In this paper, we show on the contrary that, independently of architecture, SGD can itself be the cause of poor generalization if one does not ensure good initialization. Specifically, we prove that any differentiably parameterized model, trained under gradient flow, obeys a weak spectral bias law which states that sufficiently high frequencies train arbitrarily slowly. This implies that very high frequencies present at initialization will remain after training, and hamper generalization. Further, we empirically test the developed theoretical insights using practical, deep networks. Finally, we contrast our framework with that supplied by the flat-minima conjecture and show that Fourier analysis grants a more reliable framework for understanding the generalization of neural networks.

Ask about this paper

Your agent reads all of it.

Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.

Questions to start from

Your agent calls

Luneget_paper_fulltext

Ask in Lune

Free to start. No credit card required.

lune papers fulltext 1b9b4329-17f7-4729-a40a-18112a59a3dd

Cited by top-tier papers4

Ask how each one uses it

Builds on20

Related papers

Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines