Si-GT: Fast Interconnect Signal Integrity Analysis for Integrated Circuit Design via Graph Transformers
Yuting Hu, Tarek Mohamed, Chenhui Xu, Hua Xiang, Hussam Amrouch, Gi-Joon Nam, Jinjun Xiong
Abstract
Signal integrity issues present significant challenges in modern integrated circuit (IC) design, as crosstalk-induced delay variation and transient glitches caused by capacitive coupling among interconnects can severely impact IC functional correctness. Although circuit simulators like SPICE can deliver accurate signal integrity analysis, their computational cost becomes prohibitive for large-scale designs. In this paper, we propose Si-GT, a novel transformer-based model for fast and accurate signal integrity analysis in IC interconnects. Our model elaborates three key designs: (1) virtual NET token to encode net-specific signal characteristics and serve as net-wise representation, (2) mesh pattern encoding to embed high-order mesh structures at each node while distinguishing uncoupled wire segments, and (3) intra-inter net (IIN) attention mechanism to capture structures of signal propagation path and coupling connections. To support model training and evaluation, we construct the first interconnect signal integrity dataset comprising 200k delay examples and 187k glitch examples using SPICE simulations as the golden reference. Our experiments show that our Si-GT surpasses state-of-the-art graph neural network and graph transformer baselines with substantially reduced computation compared to SPICE, offering a scalable and effective solution for interconnect signal integrity analysis in IC design verification. We release the code, model, and datasets at https://github.com/xlab-ub/Si-GT .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on14
- Do Transformers Really Perform Badly for Graph Representation?Chengxuan Ying, Tianle Cai, Shengjie Luo, Shuxin Zheng et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 1,632 citations
- DeepGCNs: Can GCNs Go As Deep As CNNs?Guohao Li, Matthias Müller, Ali K. Thabet, Bernard GhanemICCV 2019 · 1,586 citations
- Recipe for a General, Powerful, Scalable Graph TransformerLadislav Rampásek, Michael Galkin, Vijay Prakash Dwivedi, Anh Tuan Luu et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 1,216 citations
- Rethinking Graph Transformers with Spectral AttentionDevin Kreuzer, Dominique Beaini, William L. Hamilton, Vincent Létourneau et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 854 citations
- Graph Neural Networks with Learnable Structural and Positional RepresentationsVijay Prakash Dwivedi, Anh Tuan Luu, Thomas Laurent, Yoshua Bengio et al.ICLR 2022 · 464 citations
Related papers
- SyncTREE: Fast Timing Analysis for Integrated Circuit Design through a Physics-informed Tree-based Graph Neural NetworkYuting Hu, Jiajie Li, Florian Klemme, Gi-Joon Nam et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 12 citations
- TraceFormer: S-parameter Prediction Framework for PCB Traces based on Graph TransformerDoyun Kim, Jaemin Park, Youngmin Oh, Bosun HwangDAC 2024 · 6 citations
- GTN-Path: Efficient Path Timing Prediction through Waveform Propagation with Graph TransformerLihao Liu, Beisi Lu, Yunhui Li, Li Shang et al.DAC 2025 · 2 citations
- LMM-IR: Large-Scale Netlist-Aware Multimodal Framework for Static IR-Drop PredictionKai Ma, Zhen Wang, Hongquan He, Qi Xu et al.DAC 2025
- DeepGate4: Efficient and Effective Representation Learning for Circuit Design at ScaleZiyang Zheng, Shan Huang, Jianyuan Zhong, Zhengyuan Shi et al.ICLR 2025
