USENIX Security2023Top-tier venue
The Role of Professional Product Reviewers in Evaluating Security and Privacy
Wentao Guo, Jason Walter, Michelle L. Mazurek
Abstract
Consumers who use Internet-connected products are often exposed to security and privacy vulnerabilities that they lack time or expertise to evaluate themselves. Can professional product reviewers help by evaluating security and privacy on their behalf? We conducted 17 interviews with product reviewers about their procedures, incentives, and assumptions regarding security and privacy. We find that reviewers have some incentives to evaluate security and privacy, but they also face substantial disincentives and challenges, leading them to consider a limited set of relevant criteria and threat models. We recommend future work to help product reviewers provide useful advice to consumers in ways that align with reviewers' business models and incentives. These include developing usable resources and tools, as well as validating the heuristics they use to judge security and privacy expediently. Background Here we provide background on professional product reviewers, defining the scope of this work. We then discuss existing research on the impact of professional product reviews, as well as existing security and privacy resources to help consumers choose safe products. 1. How frequently do you discuss security and privacy in your reviews, if at all?
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 1a8ab603-7ac6-4ef6-86a0-e04ad5b07159Builds on18
- Understanding the Mirai BotnetManos Antonakakis, Tim April, Michael D. Bailey, Matt Bernhard et al.USENIX Security 2017 · 2,003 citations
- Tranco: A Research-Oriented Top Sites Ranking Hardened Against ManipulationVictor Le Pochat, Tom van Goethem, Samaneh Tajalizadehkhoob, Maciej Korczynski et al.NDSS 2019 · 826 citations
- SoK: Security Evaluation of Home-Based IoT DeploymentsOmar Alrawi, Chaz Lever, Manos Antonakakis, Fabian MonroseS&P 2019 · 411 citations
- 50 Ways to Leak Your Data: An Exploration of Apps' Circumvention of the Android Permissions SystemJoel Reardon, Álvaro Feal, Primal Wijesekera, Amit Elazari Bar On et al.USENIX Security 2019 · 196 citations
- Understanding and Improving Security and Privacy in Multi-User Smart Homes: A Design Exploration and In-Home User StudyEric Zeng, Franziska RoesnerUSENIX Security 2019 · 190 citations
Related papers
- I Think They're Trying to Tell Me Something: Advice Sources and Selection for Digital SecurityElissa M. Redmiles, Amelia R. Malone, Michelle L. MazurekS&P 2016 · 151 citations
- Online Privacy Heuristics that Predict Information DisclosureS. Shyam Sundar, Jinyoung Kim, Mary Beth Rosson, Maria D. MolinaCHI 2020 · 62 citations
- "All Sorts of Other Reasons to Do It": Explaining the Persistence of Sub-optimal IoT Security AdviceVeerle van Harten, Carlos Hernandez Gañán, Michel van Eeten, Simon ParkinCHI 2025 · 4 citations
- I Don't Need an Expert! Making URL Phishing Features Human ComprehensibleKholoud Althobaiti, Nicole Meng, Kami VanieaCHI 2021 · 32 citations
- Examining Consumer Reviews to Understand Security and Privacy Issues in the Market of Smart Home DevicesSwaathi Vetrivel, Veerle van Harten, Carlos Hernandez Gañán, Michel van Eeten et al.USENIX Security 2023
