Universal Access for Social XR Across Devices: The Impact of Immersion on the Experience in Asymmetric Virtual Collaboration
Christian Merz, Christopher Göttfert, Carolin Wienrich, Marc Erich Latoschik
Abstract
This article investigates the influence of input/output device characteristics and degrees of immersion on the User Experience (UX) of specific eXtended Reality (XR) effects, i.e., presence, self-perception, other-perception, and task perception. It targets universal access to social XR, where dedicated XR hardware is unavailable or can not be used, but participation is desirable or even necessary. We compare three different device configurations: (i) desktop screen with mouse, (ii) desktop screen with tracked controllers, and (iii) Head-Mounted Display (HMD) with tracked controllers. 87 participants took part in collaborative dyadic interaction (a sorting task) with asymmetric device configurations in a specifically developed social XR. In line with prior research, the sense of presence and embodiment were significantly lower for the desktop setups. However, we only found minor differences in task load and no differences in usability and enjoyment of the task between the conditions. Additionally, the perceived humanness and virtual human plausibility of the other were not affected, no matter the device used. Finally, there was no impact regarding co-presence and social presence independent of the level of immersion of oneself or the other. We conclude that the device in social XR is important for self-perception and presence. However, our results indicate that the devices do not affect important UX and usability aspects, specifically, the qualities of social interaction in collaborative scenarios, paving the way for universal access to social XR encounters and significantly promoting participation.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 1a60bd57-11f7-48ac-b8a7-87be15720a83Cited by top-tier papers2
- How Do We Evaluate Experiences in Immersive Environments?Xiang Li, Wei He, Per Ola KristenssonCHI 2026 · 4 citations
- When Shared Worlds Break: Demystifying Defects in Multi-user Extended Reality Software SystemsShuqing Li, Chenran Zhang, Binchang Li, Cuiyun Gao et al.FSE 2026 · 1 citation
Builds on1
Related papers
- Influence of Interactivity and Social Environments on User Experience and Social Acceptability in Virtual RealityMaurizio Vergari, Tanja Kojic, Francesco Vona, Franca Garzotto et al.IEEE VR 2021 · 36 citations
- Extended Reality (XR) Remote Research: a Survey of Drawbacks and OpportunitiesJack Ratcliffe, Francesco Soave, Nick Bryan-Kinns, Laurissa Tokarchuk et al.CHI 2021 · 136 citations
- Social Presence in Remote Collaboration Across the Reality-Virtuality ContinuumJonah-Noël Kaiser, Simon Kimmel, Jonathan Kutter, Eric Landwehr et al.CSCW 2026
- A Comparative Study of Using Augmented vs Virtual Reality in Collaborative TasksTelmo Zarraonandia, Alvaro Montero, Roberto Cuervo-Rosillo, Paloma Díaz et al.IEEE VR 2026
- Environment Spatial Restitution for Remote Physical AR CollaborationBruno Caby, Guillaume Bataille, Florence Danglade, Jean-Rémy ChardonnetIEEE VR 2025 · 1 citation
