Unveiling Factual Recall Behaviors of Large Language Models through Knowledge Neurons
Yifei Wang, Yuheng Chen, Wanting Wen, Yu Sheng, Linjing Li, Daniel Zeng
Abstract
In this paper, we investigate whether Large Language Models (LLMs) actively recall or retrieve their internal repositories of factual knowledge when faced with reasoning tasks. Through an analysis of LLMs’ internal factual recall at each reasoning step via Knowledge Neurons, we reveal that LLMs fail to harness the critical factual associations under certain circumstances. Instead, they tend to opt for alternative, shortcut-like pathways to answer reasoning questions. By manually manipulating the recall process of parametric knowledge in LLMs, we demonstrate that enhancing this recall process directly improves reasoning performance whereas suppressing it leads to notable degradation. Furthermore, we assess the effect of Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting, a powerful technique for addressing complex reasoning tasks. Our findings indicate that CoT can intensify the recall of factual knowledge by encouraging LLMs to engage in orderly and reliable reasoning. Furthermore, we explored how contextual conflicts affect the retrieval of facts during the reasoning process to gain a comprehensive understanding of the factual recall behaviors of LLMs. Code and data will be available soon.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 1a51e378-f0ae-4295-85db-36dc47e52950Cited by top-tier papers9
- POSITION BIAS MITIGATES POSITION BIAS: Mitigate Position Bias Through Inter-Position Knowledge DistillationYifei Wang, Feng Xiong, Yong Wang, Linjing Li et al.EMNLP 2025 · 16 citations
- Empty Shelves or Lost Keys? Recall Is the Bottleneck for Parametric FactualityNitay Calderon, Eyal Ben-David, Zorik Gekhman, Eran Ofek et al.ICML 2026 · 8 citations
- FASA: FREQUENCY-AWARE SPARSE ATTENTIONYifei Wang, Yueqi Wang, Zhenrui Yue, Huimin Zeng et al.ICLR 2026 · 7 citations
- Neuron Empirical Gradient: Discovering and Quantifying Neurons' Global Linear ControllabilityXin Zhao, Zehui Jiang, Naoki YoshinagaACL 2025 · 3 citations
- Tracing and Dissecting How LLMs Recall Factual Knowledge for Real World QuestionsYiqun Wang, Chaoqun Wan, Sile Hu, Yonggang Zhang et al.ACL 2025 · 2 citations
Builds on23
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Large Language Models are Zero-Shot ReasonersTakeshi Kojima, Shixiang Shane Gu, Machel Reid, Yutaka Matsuo et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 8,168 citations
- Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPTKevin Meng, David Bau, Alex Andonian, Yonatan BelinkovNeurIPS 2022 · 3,415 citations
- Large Language Models Struggle to Learn Long-Tail KnowledgeNikhil Kandpal, Haikang Deng, Adam Roberts, Eric Wallace et al.ICML 2023 · 623 citations
- Towards Revealing the Mystery behind Chain of Thought: A Theoretical PerspectiveGuhao Feng, Bohang Zhang, Yuntian Gu, Haotian Ye et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 470 citations
Related papers
- Why Prompt Design Matters and Works: A Complexity Analysis of Prompt Search Space in LLMsXiang Zhang, Juntai Cao, Chenyu You, Dujian DingACL 2025 · 21 citations
- DeCoT: Debiasing Chain-of-Thought for Knowledge-Intensive Tasks in Large Language Models via Causal InterventionJunda Wu, Tong Yu, Xiang Chen, Haoliang Wang et al.ACL 2024
- Chain-of-Thought Reasoning Without PromptingXuezhi Wang, Denny ZhouNeurIPS 2024 · 305 citations
- Boosting Language Models Reasoning with Chain-of-Knowledge PromptingJianing Wang, Qiushi Sun, Xiang Li, Ming GaoACL 2024
- To CoT or not to CoT? Chain-of-thought helps mainly on math and symbolic reasoningZayne Rea Sprague, Fangcong Yin, Juan Diego Rodriguez, Dongwei Jiang et al.ICLR 2025
