Lune

EMNLP Findings2025

Improving Influence-based Instruction Tuning Data Selection for Balanced Learning of Diverse Capabilities

Qirun Dai, Dylan Zhang, Jiaqi W. Ma, Hao Peng

Abstract

Selecting appropriate training data is crucial for instruction fine-tuning of large language models (LLMs), which aims to (1) elicit strong capabilities, and (2) achieve balanced performance across different tasks.Influence-based methods show promise in achieving (1), by estimating the contribution of each training example to the model's predictions, but often struggle with (2).Our systematic investigation reveals that this underperformance can be attributed to an inherent bias, where some tasks intrinsically have greater influence than others.As a result, data selection is often biased towards these tasks, not only hurting the model's performance on others but also, counterintuitively, harming performance on these high-influence tasks themselves.To address this, we propose BIDS, a Balanced and Influential Data Selection algorithm.BIDS first normalizes influence scores of the training data, and then iteratively chooses the training example with the highest influence on the most underrepresented task.Experiments with both Llama-3 and Mistral-v0.3 on seven benchmarks spanning five diverse capabilities show that BIDS consistently outperforms both state-of-the-art influence-based algorithms and other non-influence-based frameworks.Surprisingly, training on a 15% subset selected by BIDS can even outperform fulldataset training with a much more balanced performance.Our analysis highlights the importance of both instance-level normalization and iterative optimization of selected data for balanced learning of diverse capabilities.Budget Method Coding Logic Knowledge Math Ins-Following Macro Avg HumanEval MBPP BBH MMLU GSM-Plus MATH IFEval 5% Random 43.5 48.9 64.8 64.9 41.5 22.5 18.1 43.4 LESS 43.9 50.7 62.7 65.1 42.5 22.6 19.7 43.9 10% Random 47.8 50.6 65.0 64.9 43.9 24.0 17.8 44.9 LESS 44.7 51.3 62.0 64.7 44.6 24.3 19.3 44.4 15% Random 48.7 51.9 65.2 65.1 45.6 25.0 18.8 45.7 LESS 46.5 51.0 63.2 64.6 44.9 24.9 21.2 45.2

Ask Lune

Ask anything. The answer quotes the paper.

Lune reads all of it and the papers around it, then shows you the passages behind every answer.

Questions to start from

Lune answers from

the full paper · 3 top-tier papers that cite it · related work

Get the answer

Free to start. No credit card required.

Cited by top-tier papers3

  1. The Best Instruction-Tuning Data are Those That FitDylan Zhang, Qirun Dai, Hao PengNeurIPS 2025 · 59 citations
  2. TRIM: Token-wise Attention-Derived Saliency for Data-Efficient Instruction TuningManish Nagaraj, Sakshi Choudhary, Utkarsh Saxena, Deepak Ravikumar et al.ICML 2026 · 2 citations
  3. Convex Dataset Valuation for Post-TrainingSiqi Zeng, Christopher Jung, Rui Li, Zhe Kang et al.ICML 2026

Builds on37

  1. Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
  2. Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
  3. LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language ModelsEdward J. Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu et al.ICLR 2022 · 18,833 citations
  4. Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou et al.ICLR 2021 · 7,905 citations
  5. Pythia: A Suite for Analyzing Large Language Models Across Training and ScalingStella Biderman, Hailey Schoelkopf, Quentin Gregory Anthony, Herbie Bradley et al.ICML 2023 · 1,822 citations

Related papers

  1. BRIEF: Bi-level Coreset Selection for Efficient Instruction Tuning in LLMsChaoyuan Shen, Chi Zhang, Chengliang Chai, Jiacheng Wang et al.VLDB 2026 · 2 citations
  2. JI2S: Joint Influence-Aware Instruction Data Selection for Efficient Fine-TuningJingyu Wei, Bo Liu, Tianjiao Wan, Baoyun Peng et al.EMNLP 2025
  3. A Critical Look at Targeted Instruction Selection: Disentangling What Matters (and What Doesn’t)Nihal Nayak, Paula Rodriguez-Diaz, Neha Hulkund, Sara Beery et al.ICML 2026 · 2 citations
  4. Less is More: High-value Data Selection for Visual Instruction TuningZikang Liu, Kun Zhou, Wayne Xin Zhao, Dawei Gao et al.ACM MM 2025 · 3 citations
  5. Smaller Language Models are capable of selecting Instruction-Tuning Training Data for Larger Language ModelsDheeraj Mekala, Alex Nguyen, Jingbo ShangACL Findings 2024 · 4 citations
Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines