How to Leverage Diverse Demonstrations in Offline Imitation Learning
Sheng Yue, Jiani Liu, Xingyuan Hua, Ju Ren, Sen Lin, Junshan Zhang, Yaoxue Zhang
Abstract
Offline Imitation Learning (IL) with imperfect demonstrations has garnered increasing attention owing to the scarcity of expert data in many real-world domains. A fundamental problem in this scenario is how to extract positive behaviors from noisy data. In general, current approaches to the problem select data building on state-action similarity to given expert demonstrations, neglecting precious information in (potentially abundant) state-actions that deviate from expert ones. In this paper, we introduce a simple yet effective data selection method that identifies positive behaviors based on their resultant states -- a more informative criterion enabling explicit utilization of dynamics information and effective extraction of both expert and beneficial diverse behaviors. Further, we devise a lightweight behavior cloning algorithm capable of leveraging the expert and selected data correctly. In the experiments, we evaluate our method on a suite of complex and high-dimensional offline IL benchmarks, including continuous-control and vision-based tasks. The results demonstrate that our method achieves state-of-the-art performance, outperforming existing methods on benchmarks, typically by , while maintaining a comparable runtime to Behavior Cloning ().
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers5
- Offline Imitation Learning with Model-based Reverse AugmentationJie-Jing Shao, Hao-Sen Shi, Lan-Zhe Guo, Yu-Feng LiKDD 2024 · 5 citations
- Context Learning for Multi-Agent DiscussionXingyuan Hua, Sheng Yue, Xinyi Li, Yizhe Zhao et al.ICLR 2026 · 4 citations
- Learning to Explore: Scaling Agentic Reasoning via Exploration-Aware Policy OptimizationXingyuan Hua, Sheng Yue, Ju RenICML 2026 · 1 citation
- Revisiting Distribution Correction Estimation for Offline Imitation Learning with Suboptimal DatasetQuang Anh PHAM, Tien Mai, Akshat KumarICML 2026
- DualCOIL: Offline Imitation Learning from Contrasting DemonstrationsHuy Hoang, Tien Mai, Pradeep Varakantham, Tanvi VermaICML 2026
Builds on13
- Bridging Offline Reinforcement Learning and Imitation Learning: A Tale of PessimismParia Rashidinejad, Banghua Zhu, Cong Ma, Jiantao Jiao et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 373 citations
- Cal-QL: Calibrated Offline RL Pre-Training for Efficient Online Fine-TuningMitsuhiko Nakamoto, Simon Zhai, Anikait Singh, Max Sobol Mark et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 296 citations
- IQ-Learn: Inverse soft-Q Learning for ImitationDivyansh Garg, Shuvam Chakraborty, Chris Cundy, Jiaming Song et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 271 citations
- Imitation Learning via Off-Policy Distribution MatchingIlya Kostrikov, Ofir Nachum, Jonathan TompsonICLR 2020 · 239 citations
- Toward the Fundamental Limits of Imitation LearningNived Rajaraman, Lin F. Yang, Jiantao Jiao, Kannan RamchandranNeurIPS 2020 · 137 citations
Related papers
- Discriminator-Weighted Offline Imitation Learning from Suboptimal DemonstrationsHaoran Xu, Xianyuan Zhan, Honglei Yin, Huiling QinICML 2022 · 105 citations
- Imitation Learning from Imperfection: Theoretical Justifications and AlgorithmsZiniu Li, Tian Xu, Zeyu Qin, Yang Yu et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 26 citations
- Should I Run Offline Reinforcement Learning or Behavioral Cloning?Aviral Kumar, Joey Hong, Anikait Singh, Sergey LevineICLR 2022 · 84 citations
- Offline Behavioral Data SelectionShiye Lei, Zhihao Cheng, Dacheng TaoKDD 2026
- Behavioral Cloning from Noisy DemonstrationsFumihiro Sasaki, Ryota YamashinaICLR 2021 · 94 citations
