Back Attention: Understanding and Enhancing Multi-Hop Reasoning in Large Language Models
Zeping Yu, Yonatan Belinkov, Sophia Ananiadou
Abstract
We investigate how large language models (LLMs) perform latent multi-hop reasoning in prompts like "Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart's mother's spouse is". To analyze this process, we introduce logit flow, an interpretability method that traces how logits propagate across layers and positions toward the final prediction. Using logit flow, we identify four distinct stages in single-hop knowledge prediction: (A) entity subject enrichment, (B) entity attribute extraction, (C) relation subject enrichment, and (D) relation attribute extraction. Extending this analysis to multi-hop reasoning, we find that failures often stem from the relation attribute extraction stage, where conflicting logits reduce prediction accuracy. To address this, we propose back attention, a novel mechanism that enables lower layers to leverage higher-layer hidden states from different positions during attention computation. With back attention, a 1-layer transformer achieves the performance of a 2-layer transformer. Applied to five LLMs, back attention improves accuracy on five reasoning datasets, demonstrating its effectiveness in enhancing latent multi-hop reasoning ability. Code and data is available at https://github. com/zepingyu0512/back-attention .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 19cf5c01-3925-4e50-800f-d260bff8bf70Cited by top-tier papers7
- Auditing Meta-Cognitive Hallucinations in Reasoning Large Language ModelsHaolang Lu, Yilian Liu, Jingxin Xu, Guoshun Nan et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 23 citations
- CaKE: Circuit-aware Editing Enables Generalizable Knowledge LearnersYunzhi Yao, Jizhan Fang, Jia-Chen Gu, Ningyu Zhang et al.EMNLP 2025 · 1 citation
- Deconstructing Pre-training: Knowledge Attribution Analysis in MoE and Dense ModelsBo Wang, Junzhuo Li, Hong Chen, Yuanlin Chu et al.AAAI 2026 · 1 citation
- ReasonAny: Incorporating Reasoning Capability to Any Model via Simple and Effective Model MergingJunyao Yang, Chen Qian, Wen Shen, Yong Liu et al.ACL 2026 · 1 citation
- Internal Chain-of-Thought: Empirical Evidence for Layer-wise Subtask Scheduling in LLMsZhipeng Yang, Junzhuo Li, Siyu Xia, Xuming HuEMNLP 2025
Builds on28
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPTKevin Meng, David Bau, Alex Andonian, Yonatan BelinkovNeurIPS 2022 · 3,415 citations
- Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language ModelsRobert Huben, Hoagy Cunningham, Logan Riggs Smith, Aidan Ewart et al.ICLR 2024 · 1,072 citations
- Large Language Models Cannot Self-Correct Reasoning YetJie Huang, Xinyun Chen, Swaroop Mishra, Huaixiu Steven Zheng et al.ICLR 2024 · 858 citations
Related papers
- Hopping Too Late: Exploring the Limitations of Large Language Models on Multi-Hop QueriesEden Biran, Daniela Gottesman, Sohee Yang, Mor Geva et al.EMNLP 2024 · 3 citations
- Exploring Layer Activation Dynamic of CoT via Knowledge ProbeChuanxin Zhang, Jiajun Liu, Yao He, Wenjun Ke et al.ACL 2026
- Do Large Language Models Latently Perform Multi-Hop Reasoning?Sohee Yang, Elena Gribovskaya, Nora Kassner, Mor Geva et al.ACL 2024
- How do Transformers Learn Implicit Reasoning?Jiaran Ye, Zijun Yao, Zhidian Huang, Liangming Pan et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 17 citations
- Unveiling Internal Reasoning Modes in LLMs: A Deep Dive into Latent Reasoning vs. Factual Shortcuts with Attribute Rate RatioYiran Yang, Haifeng Sun, Jingyu Wang, Qi Qi et al.EMNLP 2025
