ClimateViz: A Benchmark for Statistical Reasoning and Fact Verification on Scientific Charts
Ruiran Su, Jiasheng Si, Zhijiang Guo, Janet B. Pierrehumbert
Abstract
Scientific fact-checking has largely focused on textual and tabular sources, neglecting scientific charts-a primary medium for conveying quantitative evidence and supporting statistical reasoning in research communication. We introduce CLIMATEVIZ, the first largescale benchmark for scientific fact-checking grounded in real-world, expert-curated scientific charts. CLIMATEVIZ comprises 49,862 claims paired with 2,896 visualizations, each labeled as support, refute, or not enough information. To enable interpretable verification, each instance includes structured knowledge graph explanations that capture statistical patterns, temporal trends, spatial comparisons, and causal relations. We conduct a comprehensive evaluation of state-of-the-art multimodal large language models, including proprietary and open-source systems, under zero-shot and few-shot settings. Our results show that current models struggle to perform fact-checking when statistical reasoning over charts is required: even the best-performing systems, such as Gemini 2.5 and InternVL 2.5, achieve only 76.2-77.8% accuracy in label-only output settings, which is far below human performance (89.3% and 92.7%). While few-shot prompting yields limited improvements, explanationaugmented outputs significantly enhance performance in some closed-source models, notably o3 and Gemini 2.5. We released our dataset and code alongside the paper. 1 (c) Subgraph of Relevant Facts Caption: Cumulative mass loss of the Greenland Ice Sheet from 1972 to 2022, showing accelerating ice loss and corresponding sea level rise.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 19a7b4af-e440-464b-8a1b-3e15f82033a6Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on11
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTTianyi Zhang, Varsha Kishore, Felix Wu, Kilian Q. Weinberger et al.ICLR 2020 · 8,443 citations
- Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language ModelsShunyu Yao, Dian Yu, Jeffrey Zhao, Izhak Shafran et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 5,068 citations
- TabFact: A Large-scale Dataset for Table-based Fact VerificationWenhu Chen, Hongmin Wang, Jianshu Chen, Yunkai Zhang et al.ICLR 2020 · 674 citations
Related papers
- Unmasking Deceptive Visuals: Benchmarking Multimodal Large Language Models on Misleading Chart Question AnsweringZixin Chen, Sicheng Song, KaShun Shum, Yanna Lin et al.EMNLP 2025 · 1 citation
- DomainCQA: Crafting Knowledge-Intensive QA from Domain-Specific ChartsYujing Lu, Ling Zhong, Jing Yang, Weiming Li et al.AAAI 2026
- RealChart2Code: Bridging the Gap in Real-World Chart-to-Code Generation via Multi-Task EvaluationJiajun Zhang, Yuying Li, Zhixun Li, Xingyu Guo et al.ACL 2026
- Charts-of-Thought: Enhancing LLM Visualization Literacy Through Structured Data ExtractionAmit Kumar Das, Mohammad Tarun, Klaus MuellerIEEE VIS 2025 · 6 citations
- MMClima: A Framework for Multimodal Climate Science Data and EvaluationMuhammad Umer Sheikh, Hassan Abid, Khawar shehzad, Ufaq Khan et al.ICML 2026 · 2 citations
